×




Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shazib E. Shaikh, Syed Zahoor Hassan. The Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services (referred as “Telenor Pakistan” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurial finance, Joint ventures, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services Case Study


Telenor Group, based in Norway, experienced stagnating growth in average revenue per user (ARPU) at its 11 subsidiary cellular networks in Europe and Asia. Buying GSM licenses to expand to new markets was now too expensive. Having favoured Telenor Pakistan with more than $1.2 billion of capital expenditure, it was now especially in need of substantial profits from this wholly owned subsidiary. Given this context, Telenor Pakistan and several other subsidiaries were directed to explore diversification avenues. They sought a self-subsisting "growth story." In the case, we follow how the VP Strategy at Telenor Pakistan presented mobile financial services for the "unbanked" as the way forward. However, at the decision point in the case (March 2008), the central bank of Pakistan had sanctioned only a certain set of business models from which the telecommunications company (telco) had to choose one, if it was to provide mobile financial services. A basic constraint was that the venture should be "bankled." There were already various novel mobile financial service models in other emerging markets that were making headlines, such as SMART Money in the Philippines and Vodafones' M-PESA in Kenya. The VP Strategy at Telenor Pakistan had to prepare a presentation to the Board of Directors regarding how to proceed. The major issues and decisions were the following: (1) why and how Telenor Pakistan would achieve a "growth story" by diversifying into financial services; (2) given the peculiarities of the Pakistani market, what type of alliance with a bank should be pursued given the local legal restrictions and the benchmark models in other countries.


Case Authors : Shazib E. Shaikh, Syed Zahoor Hassan

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial finance, Joint ventures, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007503) -10007503 - -
Year 1 3446882 -6560621 3446882 0.9434 3251775
Year 2 3975930 -2584691 7422812 0.89 3538564
Year 3 3943882 1359191 11366694 0.8396 3311359
Year 4 3235262 4594453 14601956 0.7921 2562631
TOTAL 14601956 12664329




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656826

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Telenor Pakistan shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Telenor Pakistan have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Telenor Pakistan often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Telenor Pakistan needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007503) -10007503 - -
Year 1 3446882 -6560621 3446882 0.8696 2997289
Year 2 3975930 -2584691 7422812 0.7561 3006374
Year 3 3943882 1359191 11366694 0.6575 2593166
Year 4 3235262 4594453 14601956 0.5718 1849772
TOTAL 10446601


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439098

(10446601 - 10007503 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007503) -10007503 - -
Year 1 3446882 -6560621 3446882 0.8333 2872402
Year 2 3975930 -2584691 7422812 0.6944 2761063
Year 3 3943882 1359191 11366694 0.5787 2282339
Year 4 3235262 4594453 14601956 0.4823 1560215
TOTAL 9476018


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531485

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476018 - 10007503 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Telenor Pakistan to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Telenor Pakistan has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Telenor Pakistan can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Telenor Pakistan, then the stock price of the Telenor Pakistan should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Telenor Pakistan should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services

References & Further Readings

Shazib E. Shaikh, Syed Zahoor Hassan (2018), "Telenor (A): From Cellular Networks to Financial Services Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Grand Hoover SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Topsun Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Kore Potash SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Alfa Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Bermaz Auto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


JTec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Hindustan Zinc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Jinyu Auto A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel