×




Alpina Inc. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Alpina Inc. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Alpina Inc. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Diana M. Trujillo. The Alpina Inc. (referred as “Alpina Alpina's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Alpina Inc. Case Study


In 2006, Alpina had processing facilities in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela and its products were distributed in 34 countries. With annual sales of nearly $275 million, it was one of the largest private dairy companies in the Andean region. Alpina's social initiatives began early in the organization's history. The founders of the company and the families that were involved in its operations created a work environment in which the needs of stakeholders were a priority. As the company grew, there were changes in its ownership structure. Yet, in 2006, the owners of Alpina, Inc. were still a relatively small number of family investors. With growth there was also an expansion of social initiatives, which were carried out in different areas. Between 2002 and 2006, the Human Resources Department initiated a series of actions to consolidate social responsibility (SR) activities and to achieve greater impact. These efforts fell short when, in 2006, upon implementing a new corporate model, the Executive Committee began to question the purpose and scope of these social activities. The case puts the students in the place of Juan Pablo FernA?ndez who, after three years in the company, was named Vice-President of Marketing. The Executive Committee gave his office the task of preparing a proposal to increase Alpina's social impact and established a limit on the amount of resources available for these activities. The information provided in the case allows the student to study and analyze two paths. One possibility was to expand the activities carried out by the company up until that point, which were aligned to varying degrees with the commercial activities of the company but were generally incorporated into the value chain. This was the path chosen by others in the industry and it would allow the company to tackle different risks and inefficiencies that affected the company's overall performance. On the other hand, there was the possibility of creating the Alpina for Nutrition Foundation, which would help avoid the criticism of benefiting from the unsatisfied nutritional needs of the poorest part of the population. In the role of Fernandez, the student must decide which of these two directions the company should take and to propose how best to make it happen.


Case Authors : Diana M. Trujillo

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Alpina Inc. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020648) -10020648 - -
Year 1 3466135 -6554513 3466135 0.9434 3269939
Year 2 3962182 -2592331 7428317 0.89 3526328
Year 3 3937536 1345205 11365853 0.8396 3306031
Year 4 3233943 4579148 14599796 0.7921 2561586
TOTAL 14599796 12663883




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643235

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Alpina Alpina's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Alpina Alpina's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Alpina Inc.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Alpina Alpina's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Alpina Alpina's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020648) -10020648 - -
Year 1 3466135 -6554513 3466135 0.8696 3014030
Year 2 3962182 -2592331 7428317 0.7561 2995979
Year 3 3937536 1345205 11365853 0.6575 2588994
Year 4 3233943 4579148 14599796 0.5718 1849017
TOTAL 10448021


The Net NPV after 4 years is 427373

(10448021 - 10020648 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020648) -10020648 - -
Year 1 3466135 -6554513 3466135 0.8333 2888446
Year 2 3962182 -2592331 7428317 0.6944 2751515
Year 3 3937536 1345205 11365853 0.5787 2278667
Year 4 3233943 4579148 14599796 0.4823 1559579
TOTAL 9478207


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542441

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478207 - 10020648 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Alpina Alpina's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Alpina Alpina's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Alpina Alpina's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Alpina Alpina's, then the stock price of the Alpina Alpina's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Alpina Alpina's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Alpina Inc.

References & Further Readings

Diana M. Trujillo (2018), "Alpina Inc. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mobicon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Park Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Property Agent Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


PVP Ventures Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Emu NL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Safety Insurance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Cereplast Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Record PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services