Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Hoffman. The Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) (referred as “Unilever Tea” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) Case Study

Unilever has successfully rolled out an initiative to sustainably source Lipton tea, and Unilever CEO Paul Polman is wondering if the company could apply the same concepts to its wider portfolio of products. The move has triggered change throughout the industry, but questions remain as to whether sustainable sourcing would be as successful with other products. Lipton's strategy of maintaining price point (shrinking margins) while increasing sales may not be a viable option for Unilever's other brands. There may be pieces of the supply chain where a sustainability program would lead to higher costs. If Unilever scaled the initiative to the rest of the organization, it had to find a way to integrate sustainability into its corporate strategy, reduce environmental impact, and boost social good, all while increasing profits.

Case Authors : Andrew Hoffman

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Sustainability

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007685)	-10007685	-	-
Year 1	3458476	-6549209	3458476	0.9434	3262713
Year 2	3977726	-2571483	7436202	0.89	3540162
Year 3	3949509	1378026	11385711	0.8396	3316084
Year 4	3248890	4626916	14634601	0.7921	2573425
TOTAL			14634601		12692384

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684699

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Unilever Tea shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Unilever Tea have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Unilever Tea often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Unilever Tea needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007685)	-10007685	-	-
Year 1	3458476	-6549209	3458476	0.8696	3007370
Year 2	3977726	-2571483	7436202	0.7561	3007732
Year 3	3949509	1378026	11385711	0.6575	2596866
Year 4	3248890	4626916	14634601	0.5718	1857563
TOTAL					10469532

The Net NPV after 4 years is 461847

(10469532 - 10007685 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007685)	-10007685	-	-
Year 1	3458476	-6549209	3458476	0.8333	2882063
Year 2	3977726	-2571483	7436202	0.6944	2762310
Year 3	3949509	1378026	11385711	0.5787	2285595
Year 4	3248890	4626916	14634601	0.4823	1566787
TOTAL					9496756

The Net NPV after 4 years is -510929

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496756 - 10007685 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Unilever Tea to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Unilever Tea has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Unilever Tea can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Unilever Tea, then the stock price of the Unilever Tea should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Unilever Tea should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B)

References & Further Readings

Andrew Hoffman (2018), "Tea and Sustainability at Unilever: Turning Over a New Leaf (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.