The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Martin Hrivnak, Elizabeth K. Keating. The The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) (referred as “Tanker Aircraft” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Budgeting, Government, Negotiations, Security & privacy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) Case Study

The September 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States precipitated US military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, increasing demand for certain military assets. Domestically, the attacks crippled an already struggling airline industry, hurting domestic aircraft orders at Boeing Company, the only US producer of large-frame commercial aircraft. Boeing's supporters on Capitol Hill proposed procuring converted Boeing 767 airframes to replace the Air Force's aging fleet of aerial refueling tanker aircraft. Yet, the Air Force could not fit a purchase of the tanker aircraft into its budget without sacrificing other key programs. Leasing the aircraft through a special purpose entity was suggested as a solution. Critics questioned the cost, need, and structure of the tanker deal and pushed Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to reject the agreement. HKS Case Number 1845.0

Case Authors : Martin Hrivnak, Elizabeth K. Keating

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Budgeting, Government, Negotiations, Security & privacy

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022670) -10022670 - -
Year 1 3450457 -6572213 3450457 0.9434 3255148
Year 2 3963841 -2608372 7414298 0.89 3527804
Year 3 3970282 1361910 11384580 0.8396 3333525
Year 4 3240544 4602454 14625124 0.7921 2566814
TOTAL 14625124 12683292

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660622

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tanker Aircraft shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tanker Aircraft have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tanker Aircraft often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tanker Aircraft needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022670) -10022670 - -
Year 1 3450457 -6572213 3450457 0.8696 3000397
Year 2 3963841 -2608372 7414298 0.7561 2997233
Year 3 3970282 1361910 11384580 0.6575 2610525
Year 4 3240544 4602454 14625124 0.5718 1852792
TOTAL 10460947

The Net NPV after 4 years is 438277

(10460947 - 10022670 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022670) -10022670 - -
Year 1 3450457 -6572213 3450457 0.8333 2875381
Year 2 3963841 -2608372 7414298 0.6944 2752667
Year 3 3970282 1361910 11384580 0.5787 2297617
Year 4 3240544 4602454 14625124 0.4823 1562762
TOTAL 9488427

The Net NPV after 4 years is -534243

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488427 - 10022670 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tanker Aircraft to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tanker Aircraft has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tanker Aircraft can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tanker Aircraft, then the stock price of the Tanker Aircraft should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tanker Aircraft should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Martin Hrivnak, Elizabeth K. Keating (2018), "The Boeing Tanker Lease Deal (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.