×




CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Valerie Wallingford, Sharon Gritzmacher. The CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services (referred as “Administrators Prairie” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services Case Study


This case focuses on a significant problem faced by county-owned Prairie Health Service's administrators: What could be done to reduce multiple billings and other redundancies among the four divisions of the organization? The administrators' goal was to implement an integrated records management system that would streamline the registration and billing processes for patients thereby increasing efficiency and timeliness, as well as reducing financial losses. While this was a fiscally responsible goal for the organization, the records management software package selected by the CEO was inadequate for the task. Rather than listen to the recommendations of his division administrators who had spent considerable time researching potential software, the CEO seemed to be basing his selection decision on the personal relationship he had developed with sales representatives from one of the software firms.


Case Authors : Valerie Wallingford, Sharon Gritzmacher

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Leadership, Organizational culture, Performance measurement, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004174) -10004174 - -
Year 1 3460962 -6543212 3460962 0.9434 3265058
Year 2 3955618 -2587594 7416580 0.89 3520486
Year 3 3957946 1370352 11374526 0.8396 3323168
Year 4 3225692 4596044 14600218 0.7921 2555050
TOTAL 14600218 12663762




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659588

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Administrators Prairie have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Administrators Prairie shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Administrators Prairie often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Administrators Prairie needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004174) -10004174 - -
Year 1 3460962 -6543212 3460962 0.8696 3009532
Year 2 3955618 -2587594 7416580 0.7561 2991016
Year 3 3957946 1370352 11374526 0.6575 2602414
Year 4 3225692 4596044 14600218 0.5718 1844300
TOTAL 10447261


The Net NPV after 4 years is 443087

(10447261 - 10004174 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004174) -10004174 - -
Year 1 3460962 -6543212 3460962 0.8333 2884135
Year 2 3955618 -2587594 7416580 0.6944 2746957
Year 3 3957946 1370352 11374526 0.5787 2290478
Year 4 3225692 4596044 14600218 0.4823 1555600
TOTAL 9477170


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527004

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477170 - 10004174 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Administrators Prairie to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Administrators Prairie has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Administrators Prairie can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Administrators Prairie, then the stock price of the Administrators Prairie should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Administrators Prairie should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services

References & Further Readings

Valerie Wallingford, Sharon Gritzmacher (2018), "CEO Decision-making at Prairie Health Services Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Origo Acquisition Unit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Guizhou BC&TV SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


BRC Asia Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


XI An Hongsheng Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Savannah Petroleum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Keihan Electric Railway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Siemens ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Sanofi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Nexion Techn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Invengo A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls