×




Hospital Sector in 1992 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hospital Sector in 1992 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hospital Sector in 1992 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg, Eric J. Vayle. The Hospital Sector in 1992 (referred as “1992 Uncertainty” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Health, Policy, Risk management, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hospital Sector in 1992 Case Study


Examines the major issues facing the hospital sector in 1992. The environment surrounding the industry is one of great uncertainty and rapid change, and involves significant public policy questions. Describes recent trends, issues and new types of competitors that hospitals face. Can be used to teach about strategy under uncertainty, scenario analysis and strategic goals and directions for not-for-profit businesses.


Case Authors : Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg, Eric J. Vayle

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Health, Policy, Risk management, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hospital Sector in 1992 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016000) -10016000 - -
Year 1 3467756 -6548244 3467756 0.9434 3271468
Year 2 3957093 -2591151 7424849 0.89 3521799
Year 3 3939062 1347911 11363911 0.8396 3307312
Year 4 3248440 4596351 14612351 0.7921 2573069
TOTAL 14612351 12673648




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657648

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. 1992 Uncertainty shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of 1992 Uncertainty have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hospital Sector in 1992

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at 1992 Uncertainty often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at 1992 Uncertainty needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016000) -10016000 - -
Year 1 3467756 -6548244 3467756 0.8696 3015440
Year 2 3957093 -2591151 7424849 0.7561 2992131
Year 3 3939062 1347911 11363911 0.6575 2589997
Year 4 3248440 4596351 14612351 0.5718 1857306
TOTAL 10454874


The Net NPV after 4 years is 438874

(10454874 - 10016000 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016000) -10016000 - -
Year 1 3467756 -6548244 3467756 0.8333 2889797
Year 2 3957093 -2591151 7424849 0.6944 2747981
Year 3 3939062 1347911 11363911 0.5787 2279550
Year 4 3248440 4596351 14612351 0.4823 1566570
TOTAL 9483898


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532102

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483898 - 10016000 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of 1992 Uncertainty to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of 1992 Uncertainty has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at 1992 Uncertainty can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at 1992 Uncertainty, then the stock price of the 1992 Uncertainty should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at 1992 Uncertainty should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hospital Sector in 1992

References & Further Readings

Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg, Eric J. Vayle (2018), "Hospital Sector in 1992 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Koatsu Kogyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


VP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Guangdong Kinlong Hardware SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Arcotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Kencana Agri Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Value Convergence SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Fujian Aonong Biological SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Gulf Island Fabrication SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


KPIT Cummins SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming