×




Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anne Snowdon, Karin Schnarr, Alexander Kunsch. The Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (referred as “Addiction Mental” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Case Study


In 1997, the Ontario Health Services Restructuring Committee mandated the merger of four facilities that treated patients with mental health and addiction issues to create what was later named the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. This new centre, to be situated in Toronto, would provide support and clinical care to those suffering from illnesses such as schizophrenia, anxiety and mood disorders, as well as substance addictions. In 1999, the newly appointed chief executive officer and his management team have to present their recommendations to the board of trustees for implementing this complex merger. The plan will need to recognize and address significant infrastructure, strategic, organizational and stakeholder challenges. The merger will be a large change for vulnerable patient populations and their families, as well as the staff at the four merging organizations and the neighbourhoods bordering the new facility.


Case Authors : Anne Snowdon, Karin Schnarr, Alexander Kunsch

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023512) -10023512 - -
Year 1 3455357 -6568155 3455357 0.9434 3259771
Year 2 3981603 -2586552 7436960 0.89 3543612
Year 3 3966975 1380423 11403935 0.8396 3330749
Year 4 3239650 4620073 14643585 0.7921 2566106
TOTAL 14643585 12700238




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676726

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Addiction Mental have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Addiction Mental shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Addiction Mental often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Addiction Mental needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023512) -10023512 - -
Year 1 3455357 -6568155 3455357 0.8696 3004658
Year 2 3981603 -2586552 7436960 0.7561 3010664
Year 3 3966975 1380423 11403935 0.6575 2608350
Year 4 3239650 4620073 14643585 0.5718 1852280
TOTAL 10475953


The Net NPV after 4 years is 452441

(10475953 - 10023512 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023512) -10023512 - -
Year 1 3455357 -6568155 3455357 0.8333 2879464
Year 2 3981603 -2586552 7436960 0.6944 2765002
Year 3 3966975 1380423 11403935 0.5787 2295703
Year 4 3239650 4620073 14643585 0.4823 1562331
TOTAL 9502501


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521011

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502501 - 10023512 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Addiction Mental to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Addiction Mental has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Addiction Mental can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Addiction Mental, then the stock price of the Addiction Mental should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Addiction Mental should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

References & Further Readings

Anne Snowdon, Karin Schnarr, Alexander Kunsch (2018), "Organizational Transformation at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mid-Con SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


XPD Soccer Gear Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


TEAC Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


H2O Retailing Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Osisko Gold Ro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


SJK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Virtual Sourcing, In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Martin Marietta Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


AGNC Invest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations