×




The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Delios, Donna Jimenez. The The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev (referred as “Beer Industry” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Joint ventures, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev Case Study


The Beer Cases present a means to explore industry evolution in a rapidly globalizing industry. In 2011, the beer industry had elements of sub-national, national and global competition. Giants, such as AB Inbev, as well as national champions, such as Tiger Breweries and Tsingtao, which were aspiring to become major regional and global players, populated the industry. Further, industry players used alternative models (strategic approaches) to meet their objectives for national, regional and global expansion. By focusing on presentations of the strategies of five major beer companies (AB InBev, Groupo Modelo, Tiger Breweries, Tsingtao and San Miguel), this set of cases helps to illustrate these points. The format used for the cases involves in-class presentations of each case, alongside rigorous questioning from the instructor to not only explore the logic of the analysis and strategy proposed in the presentation for each company, but to also nudge the class toward an understanding of the major trends in the growth of the beer industry and key success factors for companies that operate in the beer industry. The class can be pushed further to connect the implications of one's assumptions about what drives success in beer sales, alongside their understanding of industry growth trends and drivers, to understand models of global competition in this industry, and forecast anticipated outcomes and strategies for the major beer companies considered in this set of presentations. Ultimately, the observations from the beer industry, which is a fairly easy product and industry to understand, can be extrapolated to other industries, to see how closely they fit the development of the beer industry. Further, lessons can also be drawn about how industry pressures influence the four key components of an international expansion strategy: product choice for expansion, market choice for geographic expansion, timing of entry and mode of entry.


Case Authors : Andrew Delios, Donna Jimenez

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Joint ventures, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005288) -10005288 - -
Year 1 3460907 -6544381 3460907 0.9434 3265007
Year 2 3966933 -2577448 7427840 0.89 3530556
Year 3 3960215 1382767 11388055 0.8396 3325073
Year 4 3246763 4629530 14634818 0.7921 2571740
TOTAL 14634818 12692376




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687088

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Beer Industry shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Beer Industry have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Beer Industry often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Beer Industry needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005288) -10005288 - -
Year 1 3460907 -6544381 3460907 0.8696 3009484
Year 2 3966933 -2577448 7427840 0.7561 2999571
Year 3 3960215 1382767 11388055 0.6575 2603906
Year 4 3246763 4629530 14634818 0.5718 1856347
TOTAL 10469309


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464021

(10469309 - 10005288 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005288) -10005288 - -
Year 1 3460907 -6544381 3460907 0.8333 2884089
Year 2 3966933 -2577448 7427840 0.6944 2754815
Year 3 3960215 1382767 11388055 0.5787 2291791
Year 4 3246763 4629530 14634818 0.4823 1565761
TOTAL 9496456


The Net NPV after 4 years is -508832

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496456 - 10005288 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Beer Industry to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Beer Industry has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Beer Industry can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Beer Industry, then the stock price of the Beer Industry should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Beer Industry should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev

References & Further Readings

Andrew Delios, Donna Jimenez (2018), "The Beer Cases (A): A-B InBev Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


BGR Energy Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


AMAG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Dayou Plus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Hikma Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Waste Connections SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Kawasumi Laboratories SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Ahluwalia Contracts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Curative Biosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


U-Nextrp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Seed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies