×




Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by W. Glenn Rowe, Christopher Williams, Sharda Prashad. The Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries (referred as “Fries President” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries Case Study


New York Fries' president and executive vice president were preparing for the next biannual meeting of domestic and international franchisees. They planned to provide an update on all aspect of corporate strategy and planning for the year ahead, but they only had a few days to formulate a new international growth strategy. The president and executive vice president were hesitant to expand into new territories partly due to poor experiences in Australia and South Korea, yet international franchisees had encouraged them to investigate promising areas of expansion into China and India. Complicating matters was the future development of the company's chain of premium hamburger restaurants. While New York Fries was a well-received brand in Canada, it had not yet decided if and how to internationalize the brand. How could the president and executive vice president pursue new opportunities while maintaining their premium brands of French fries and hamburgers?


Case Authors : W. Glenn Rowe, Christopher Williams, Sharda Prashad

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : International business, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014049) -10014049 - -
Year 1 3467006 -6547043 3467006 0.9434 3270760
Year 2 3965213 -2581830 7432219 0.89 3529025
Year 3 3970111 1388281 11402330 0.8396 3333382
Year 4 3237898 4626179 14640228 0.7921 2564718
TOTAL 14640228 12697886




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683837

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fries President shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fries President have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fries President often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fries President needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014049) -10014049 - -
Year 1 3467006 -6547043 3467006 0.8696 3014788
Year 2 3965213 -2581830 7432219 0.7561 2998271
Year 3 3970111 1388281 11402330 0.6575 2610412
Year 4 3237898 4626179 14640228 0.5718 1851279
TOTAL 10474750


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460701

(10474750 - 10014049 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014049) -10014049 - -
Year 1 3467006 -6547043 3467006 0.8333 2889172
Year 2 3965213 -2581830 7432219 0.6944 2753620
Year 3 3970111 1388281 11402330 0.5787 2297518
Year 4 3237898 4626179 14640228 0.4823 1561486
TOTAL 9501796


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512253

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501796 - 10014049 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fries President to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fries President has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fries President can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fries President, then the stock price of the Fries President should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fries President should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries

References & Further Readings

W. Glenn Rowe, Christopher Williams, Sharda Prashad (2018), "Developing an International Growth Strategy at New York Fries Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Interface, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


FARO SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Shanghai Lingang B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Shanghai Haohai Biological Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Orthocell Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


TD Ameritrade SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Boditech Med SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


GlobalSCAPE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Silkroad Nickel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Billion Industrial Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Trident SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel