×




Watermill Ventures Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Watermill Ventures case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Watermill Ventures case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David A. Garvin, Artemis March. The Watermill Ventures (referred as “Watermill Acquires” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Change management, Developing employees, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Watermill Ventures Case Study


Watermill Ventures acquires and turns around an underperforming business. The case describes the criteria the company uses to identify acquisition candidates, its screening and selection process, and the way it introduces strategic thinking at the business it acquires. Steve Karol, Watermill's founder, is concerned because the company has only acquired two companies in its three years of operation. He is considering a number of actions, including establishing a Web site to broaden the base of contact.


Case Authors : David A. Garvin, Artemis March

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Change management, Developing employees, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Watermill Ventures Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016314) -10016314 - -
Year 1 3448321 -6567993 3448321 0.9434 3253133
Year 2 3959925 -2608068 7408246 0.89 3524319
Year 3 3936543 1328475 11344789 0.8396 3305197
Year 4 3230073 4558548 14574862 0.7921 2558520
TOTAL 14574862 12641170




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2624856

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Watermill Acquires have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Watermill Acquires shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Watermill Ventures

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Watermill Acquires often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Watermill Acquires needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016314) -10016314 - -
Year 1 3448321 -6567993 3448321 0.8696 2998540
Year 2 3959925 -2608068 7408246 0.7561 2994272
Year 3 3936543 1328475 11344789 0.6575 2588341
Year 4 3230073 4558548 14574862 0.5718 1846805
TOTAL 10427958


The Net NPV after 4 years is 411644

(10427958 - 10016314 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016314) -10016314 - -
Year 1 3448321 -6567993 3448321 0.8333 2873601
Year 2 3959925 -2608068 7408246 0.6944 2749948
Year 3 3936543 1328475 11344789 0.5787 2278092
Year 4 3230073 4558548 14574862 0.4823 1557713
TOTAL 9459353


The Net NPV after 4 years is -556961

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9459353 - 10016314 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Watermill Acquires to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Watermill Acquires has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Watermill Acquires can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Watermill Acquires, then the stock price of the Watermill Acquires should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Watermill Acquires should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Watermill Ventures

References & Further Readings

David A. Garvin, Artemis March (2018), "Watermill Ventures Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


G-Tekt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


DeGem SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Kuraray SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Talent Property SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Perdana Karya Perkasa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Carlsberg B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Thales ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment