MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Xu Zhiduan, Shi Yun, Xu Yong. The MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation (referred as “Mgt Factory” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation Case Study

Established in 1945, MGT Group (MGT, or the Group) was headquartered in France. Its LSD factory was a well-known global engineering provider specializing in the design and manufacture of high-precision valves. At the end of 2007, MGT decided to transfer the LSD factory in France to its Fuzhou factory in China. Two people were put in charge of this project: Kevin Lurton, vice-chief operations officer of MGT Control Systems Division, and Jian Li, the general manager of MGT Fuzhou Company. Lurton and Li faced a series of challenges, ranging from the need for strategic planning to the need for an implementation policy for supply chain reconstruction during this cross-border factory relocation. Amid the tide of globalization, enterprises are already able to extend their footprint to every corner of the world. For many multinational enterprises, transferring a product line, or even a whole factory, to another country has become a key step toward globalization.

Case Authors : Xu Zhiduan, Shi Yun, Xu Yong

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013446)	-10013446	-	-
Year 1	3459309	-6554137	3459309	0.9434	3263499
Year 2	3954442	-2599695	7413751	0.89	3519439
Year 3	3941050	1341355	11354801	0.8396	3308982
Year 4	3237812	4579167	14592613	0.7921	2564650
TOTAL			14592613		12656570

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643124

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mgt Factory shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mgt Factory have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mgt Factory often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mgt Factory needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013446)	-10013446	-	-
Year 1	3459309	-6554137	3459309	0.8696	3008095
Year 2	3954442	-2599695	7413751	0.7561	2990126
Year 3	3941050	1341355	11354801	0.6575	2591304
Year 4	3237812	4579167	14592613	0.5718	1851230
TOTAL					10440755

The Net NPV after 4 years is 427309

(10440755 - 10013446 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013446)	-10013446	-	-
Year 1	3459309	-6554137	3459309	0.8333	2882758
Year 2	3954442	-2599695	7413751	0.6944	2746140
Year 3	3941050	1341355	11354801	0.5787	2280700
Year 4	3237812	4579167	14592613	0.4823	1561445
TOTAL					9471043

The Net NPV after 4 years is -542403

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471043 - 10013446 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mgt Factory to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mgt Factory has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mgt Factory can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mgt Factory, then the stock price of the Mgt Factory should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mgt Factory should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation

References & Further Readings

Xu Zhiduan, Shi Yun, Xu Yong (2018), "MGT Group: Reconstructing the Supply Chain After a Cross-Border Factory Relocation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.