×




Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anita M. McGahan, Greg Keller. The Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision (referred as “Saturn Ii” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economics, Growth strategy, Manufacturing, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision Case Study


In the Spring of 1994, Saturn Corp. was setting sales records by attracting more than 25,000 buyers per month. Saturn officials believed there was a long-term opportunity to sell 400,000 to 500,000 cars per year in the United States and selected international markets. Saturn managers had been reviewing options for a second assembly plant (known as "Module II") with General Motors (GM) since the beginning of the year. One possibility was to expand capacity at Saturn's existing production facility in Spring Hill, Tennessee. A second set of options involved refitting one of several plants that had been mothballed or was scheduled to close shortly.


Case Authors : Anita M. McGahan, Greg Keller

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Economics, Growth strategy, Manufacturing, Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000636) -10000636 - -
Year 1 3467736 -6532900 3467736 0.9434 3271449
Year 2 3971333 -2561567 7439069 0.89 3534472
Year 3 3938792 1377225 11377861 0.8396 3307086
Year 4 3237113 4614338 14614974 0.7921 2564097
TOTAL 14614974 12677104




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676468

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Saturn Ii shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Saturn Ii have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Saturn Ii often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Saturn Ii needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000636) -10000636 - -
Year 1 3467736 -6532900 3467736 0.8696 3015423
Year 2 3971333 -2561567 7439069 0.7561 3002898
Year 3 3938792 1377225 11377861 0.6575 2589820
Year 4 3237113 4614338 14614974 0.5718 1850830
TOTAL 10458970


The Net NPV after 4 years is 458334

(10458970 - 10000636 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000636) -10000636 - -
Year 1 3467736 -6532900 3467736 0.8333 2889780
Year 2 3971333 -2561567 7439069 0.6944 2757870
Year 3 3938792 1377225 11377861 0.5787 2279394
Year 4 3237113 4614338 14614974 0.4823 1561108
TOTAL 9488151


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512485

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488151 - 10000636 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Saturn Ii to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Saturn Ii has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Saturn Ii can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Saturn Ii, then the stock price of the Saturn Ii should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Saturn Ii should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision

References & Further Readings

Anita M. McGahan, Greg Keller (2018), "Saturn Corp.'s Module II Decision Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


ICSA India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


OceanaGold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Denso Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Poletowin Pitcrew SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Bioalpha SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Samjin LND SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Agro Tech Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing