×




THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Duncan MacLaren. The THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team (referred as “Boston Headquarters” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Negotiations, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team Case Study


Accompanied by product #PON243Two-party or two-team, multi-issue, integrative/distributive negotiation between representatives of a new low-cost airline and a potential headquarters city over an incentives package and airport facilities. Fresh Air, a new low-cost airline, is looking for a headquarters city. It is negotiating with the city of Boston, its top choice for a headquarters location, over an incentive package and airport facilities. Fresh Air plans to build on the brand reputation of its parent airline, which stands for innovation, fun, unparalleled customer service, and empowered employees. It believes that a unique corporate culture and happy customers will allow it to charge lower prices, to fill its planes, and to run profitable operations. Boston seeks to reinvent itself as a center of American business after years of business decline. The opening of a low-cost carrier would be an important part of this effort. However, in these tight fiscal times, Boston is limited financially. This is a role play case.


Case Authors : Duncan MacLaren

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : IT, Negotiations, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016659) -10016659 - -
Year 1 3446901 -6569758 3446901 0.9434 3251793
Year 2 3954192 -2615566 7401093 0.89 3519217
Year 3 3965862 1350296 11366955 0.8396 3329814
Year 4 3231708 4582004 14598663 0.7921 2559815
TOTAL 14598663 12660640




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643981

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Boston Headquarters have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Boston Headquarters shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Boston Headquarters often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Boston Headquarters needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016659) -10016659 - -
Year 1 3446901 -6569758 3446901 0.8696 2997305
Year 2 3954192 -2615566 7401093 0.7561 2989937
Year 3 3965862 1350296 11366955 0.6575 2607619
Year 4 3231708 4582004 14598663 0.5718 1847740
TOTAL 10442601


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425942

(10442601 - 10016659 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016659) -10016659 - -
Year 1 3446901 -6569758 3446901 0.8333 2872418
Year 2 3954192 -2615566 7401093 0.6944 2745967
Year 3 3965862 1350296 11366955 0.5787 2295059
Year 4 3231708 4582004 14598663 0.4823 1558501
TOTAL 9471944


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544715

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471944 - 10016659 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Boston Headquarters to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Boston Headquarters has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Boston Headquarters can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Boston Headquarters, then the stock price of the Boston Headquarters should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Boston Headquarters should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team

References & Further Readings

Duncan MacLaren (2018), "THE GE INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT - Confidential Instructions for the GEII Team Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Man Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hong Kong Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Sonic Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Alam Sutera Realty SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Bel Fuse A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dufu Tech Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


OM Asset SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Nippon Densetsu Kogyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Newcapec Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals