×




Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mitchell A. Petersen, Rashmi Singhal. The Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? (referred as “Vioxx Merck” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? Case Study


Once a decision has turned out poorly-such as Merck's decision to launch and support the painkiller Vioxx-it is easy to criticize. However, are these bad outcomes the result of a good decision which turned out unlucky, or are they decisions where the bad outcome could have been predicted? This case follows Merck's pharmaceutical product Vioxx from initial development to launch and subsequent withdrawal, and considers the decisions made at each stage by the Merck executives involved. The case concludes by examining the financial impact of the Vioxx withdrawal on the company and on the Merck stock value.


Case Authors : Mitchell A. Petersen, Rashmi Singhal

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Organizational culture, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021690) -10021690 - -
Year 1 3449144 -6572546 3449144 0.9434 3253909
Year 2 3976899 -2595647 7426043 0.89 3539426
Year 3 3970890 1375243 11396933 0.8396 3334036
Year 4 3251424 4626667 14648357 0.7921 2575432
TOTAL 14648357 12702804




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681114

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Vioxx Merck shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Vioxx Merck have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Vioxx Merck often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Vioxx Merck needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021690) -10021690 - -
Year 1 3449144 -6572546 3449144 0.8696 2999256
Year 2 3976899 -2595647 7426043 0.7561 3007107
Year 3 3970890 1375243 11396933 0.6575 2610925
Year 4 3251424 4626667 14648357 0.5718 1859012
TOTAL 10476300


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454610

(10476300 - 10021690 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021690) -10021690 - -
Year 1 3449144 -6572546 3449144 0.8333 2874287
Year 2 3976899 -2595647 7426043 0.6944 2761735
Year 3 3970890 1375243 11396933 0.5787 2297969
Year 4 3251424 4626667 14648357 0.4823 1568009
TOTAL 9502000


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519690

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502000 - 10021690 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Vioxx Merck to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Vioxx Merck has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Vioxx Merck can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Vioxx Merck, then the stock price of the Vioxx Merck should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Vioxx Merck should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck?

References & Further Readings

Mitchell A. Petersen, Rashmi Singhal (2018), "Vioxx: Too Risky for Merck? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


PT Cahayasakti Investindo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hokuetsu Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


CRISIL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Kyokuyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Riberesute SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Meiling A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Canare Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


EPI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Shineroad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing