×




Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stefanos Zenios, Robert Chess, Lyn Denend. The Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) (referred as “Humira Abbott” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Government, Marketing, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) Case Study


In August 2002, the FDA had notified the executive steering committee for Abbott Laboratories' new rheumatoid arthritis drug to expect approval significantly ahead of schedule. If everything went smoothly, the compound D2E7 (brand name HUMIRA) would be approved for sale in the United States before the end of the year. This gave Abbott and its HUMIRA brand team no more than four months to complete preparations for the product's launch. Abbott acquired D2E7, a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, when the company purchased Knoll Pharmaceuticals in March 2001. With a significant head start and combined 2002 sales anticipated to exceed $2 billion, Enbrel (from Immunex, later acquired by Amgen) and Remicade (from the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Centocor) would provide HUMIRA with tough competition. Yet, with the rheumatoid arthritis market expected to grow to over $7.5 billion by 2008, there was still a significant opportunity for Abbott. The executive steering committee knew that the HUMIRA team would have to orchestrate every aspect of the product's global launch carefully to quickly and effectively establish HUMIRA in this challenging market.


Case Authors : Stefanos Zenios, Robert Chess, Lyn Denend

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Government, Marketing, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014205) -10014205 - -
Year 1 3468935 -6545270 3468935 0.9434 3272580
Year 2 3981975 -2563295 7450910 0.89 3543944
Year 3 3945664 1382369 11396574 0.8396 3312856
Year 4 3245191 4627560 14641765 0.7921 2570495
TOTAL 14641765 12699875




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685670

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Humira Abbott have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Humira Abbott shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Humira Abbott often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Humira Abbott needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014205) -10014205 - -
Year 1 3468935 -6545270 3468935 0.8696 3016465
Year 2 3981975 -2563295 7450910 0.7561 3010945
Year 3 3945664 1382369 11396574 0.6575 2594338
Year 4 3245191 4627560 14641765 0.5718 1855448
TOTAL 10477197


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462992

(10477197 - 10014205 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014205) -10014205 - -
Year 1 3468935 -6545270 3468935 0.8333 2890779
Year 2 3981975 -2563295 7450910 0.6944 2765260
Year 3 3945664 1382369 11396574 0.5787 2283370
Year 4 3245191 4627560 14641765 0.4823 1565003
TOTAL 9504413


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509792

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9504413 - 10014205 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Humira Abbott to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Humira Abbott has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Humira Abbott can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Humira Abbott, then the stock price of the Humira Abbott should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Humira Abbott should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed)

References & Further Readings

Stefanos Zenios, Robert Chess, Lyn Denend (2018), "Abbott Laboratories and HUMIRA: Launching a Blockbuster Drug (Condensed) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


RSA Insurance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Genufood Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Invitrocue SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Bengal Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Nippon Systemware SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Global Ecology Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Calbee Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Gitanjali Gems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Bakrie Sumatera SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops