×




Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael D. Watkins. The Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) (referred as “Piece Rewritten” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate communications, Health, International business, Negotiations, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) Case Study


Supplements the (A) case. A rewritten version of an earlier piece.


Case Authors : Michael D. Watkins

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Corporate communications, Health, International business, Negotiations, Policy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010615) -10010615 - -
Year 1 3472890 -6537725 3472890 0.9434 3276311
Year 2 3968632 -2569093 7441522 0.89 3532068
Year 3 3972999 1403906 11414521 0.8396 3335807
Year 4 3244599 4648505 14659120 0.7921 2570026
TOTAL 14659120 12714213




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2703598

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Piece Rewritten shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Piece Rewritten have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Piece Rewritten often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Piece Rewritten needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010615) -10010615 - -
Year 1 3472890 -6537725 3472890 0.8696 3019904
Year 2 3968632 -2569093 7441522 0.7561 3000856
Year 3 3972999 1403906 11414521 0.6575 2612311
Year 4 3244599 4648505 14659120 0.5718 1855110
TOTAL 10488182


The Net NPV after 4 years is 477567

(10488182 - 10010615 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010615) -10010615 - -
Year 1 3472890 -6537725 3472890 0.8333 2894075
Year 2 3968632 -2569093 7441522 0.6944 2755994
Year 3 3972999 1403906 11414521 0.5787 2299189
Year 4 3244599 4648505 14659120 0.4823 1564718
TOTAL 9513977


The Net NPV after 4 years is -496638

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9513977 - 10010615 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Piece Rewritten to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Piece Rewritten has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Piece Rewritten can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Piece Rewritten, then the stock price of the Piece Rewritten should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Piece Rewritten should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B)

References & Further Readings

Michael D. Watkins (2018), "Medical Technology Industry and Japan (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Seiwa Chuo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Firstwave Cloud SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


IFCI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Opal Luxury Time Products Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Open Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Torrent Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Lonking Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Prospect SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Asian Star SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Motherson Sumi Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Global Future City SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)