×




EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bruce Patton. The EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist (referred as “Garfield Eazer” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Conflict, Negotiations, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist Case Study


Accompanied by product #PON214.Two-party negotiation between lawyers for an auto mechanic and a customer over a disputed auto repair bill. Susan Garfield has a billing dispute with John Eazer, owner of a local garage, over some work done on Garfield's car. Finding the bill significantly higher than the original informal estimate, Garfield angrily confronted Eazer. Eazer prepared a second bill at an even higher figure. Frustrated, Garfield returned to the garage after closing time with a spare key and drove her car home, without paying anything. Eazer turned to his child-in-law, an attorney, wishing to file a criminal complaint. When phoned, Garfield referred the attorney to her father, a senior partner in a local law firm. Garfield's father is letting one of his young associates handle the case. This is a role play case.


Case Authors : Bruce Patton

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Conflict, Negotiations, Regulation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000644) -10000644 - -
Year 1 3470878 -6529766 3470878 0.9434 3274413
Year 2 3976856 -2552910 7447734 0.89 3539388
Year 3 3955952 1403042 11403686 0.8396 3321494
Year 4 3246295 4649337 14649981 0.7921 2571370
TOTAL 14649981 12706664




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2706020

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Garfield Eazer have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Garfield Eazer shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Garfield Eazer often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Garfield Eazer needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000644) -10000644 - -
Year 1 3470878 -6529766 3470878 0.8696 3018155
Year 2 3976856 -2552910 7447734 0.7561 3007074
Year 3 3955952 1403042 11403686 0.6575 2601103
Year 4 3246295 4649337 14649981 0.5718 1856080
TOTAL 10482412


The Net NPV after 4 years is 481768

(10482412 - 10000644 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000644) -10000644 - -
Year 1 3470878 -6529766 3470878 0.8333 2892398
Year 2 3976856 -2552910 7447734 0.6944 2761706
Year 3 3955952 1403042 11403686 0.5787 2289324
Year 4 3246295 4649337 14649981 0.4823 1565536
TOTAL 9508964


The Net NPV after 4 years is -491680

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9508964 - 10000644 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Garfield Eazer to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Garfield Eazer has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Garfield Eazer can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Garfield Eazer, then the stock price of the Garfield Eazer should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Garfield Eazer should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist

References & Further Readings

Bruce Patton (2018), "EAZY'S GARAGE - Confidential Instructions for the Counsel of Dr. Susan Garfield, Psychiatrist Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sakai Ovex Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Jakarta Kyoei SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Dream Unlimited SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Jason Furniture Hangzhou SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Granite REIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Altarea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


MEC Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing