Framing and Negotiation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Framing and Negotiation case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Framing and Negotiation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by George Wu. The Framing and Negotiation (referred as “Framing Dialog” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Framing and Negotiation Case Study

How can framing--alternative description of an object, event, or situation--can be used effectively in negotiation? A real estate dialog is used to illustrate three common varieties of framing: losses versus gains; short and long horizons; and aggregation and segregation.

Case Authors : George Wu

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Negotiations

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Framing and Negotiation Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021863) -10021863 - -
Year 1 3454659 -6567204 3454659 0.9434 3259112
Year 2 3982592 -2584612 7437251 0.89 3544493
Year 3 3974746 1390134 11411997 0.8396 3337273
Year 4 3238809 4628943 14650806 0.7921 2565440
TOTAL 14650806 12706318

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684455

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Framing Dialog have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Framing Dialog shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Framing and Negotiation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Framing Dialog often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Framing Dialog needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021863) -10021863 - -
Year 1 3454659 -6567204 3454659 0.8696 3004051
Year 2 3982592 -2584612 7437251 0.7561 3011412
Year 3 3974746 1390134 11411997 0.6575 2613460
Year 4 3238809 4628943 14650806 0.5718 1851800
TOTAL 10480723

The Net NPV after 4 years is 458860

(10480723 - 10021863 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021863) -10021863 - -
Year 1 3454659 -6567204 3454659 0.8333 2878883
Year 2 3982592 -2584612 7437251 0.6944 2765689
Year 3 3974746 1390134 11411997 0.5787 2300200
Year 4 3238809 4628943 14650806 0.4823 1561926
TOTAL 9506697

The Net NPV after 4 years is -515166

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9506697 - 10021863 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Framing Dialog to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Framing Dialog has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Framing Dialog can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Framing Dialog, then the stock price of the Framing Dialog should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Framing Dialog should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Framing and Negotiation

References & Further Readings

George Wu (2018), "Framing and Negotiation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Shanghai Jiaoda Onlly SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs

Complete Plant A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)

Global Mediacom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV

Scottish American SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services

Shenzhen Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services

Toyo Knife SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods

Jindal Photo Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Photography

China Metal Resources Utilization SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products

JTI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services

M3 Tech Asia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming

Yamano SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories