×




Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kenneth G. Hardy, Veronika Papyrina. The Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters (referred as “Loblaw Superstores” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters Case Study


In February 2007, Loblaw Companies Limited (Loblaw) was far and away the dominant food retailer in Canada with a market share of 35 per cent across its various retailing formats. As part of its long term retailing strategy and in a bid to reduce the impact of Wal-Mart Canada's entry into food retailing, in 2004 Loblaw began to build new The Real Canadian Superstores in Ontario and position them as "blockers" that resembled Wal-Mart's U.S. combination food and general merchandise superstores. It overhauled its entire logistical system to improve its cost structure and it brought in new senior executives in 2006. Unfortunately, The Real Canadian Superstores appeared to be disappointing some customers, retail analysts, industry experts and even former Loblaw executives. Meanwhile, Wal-Mart entered the retail food market in 2006 with distinctive emphasis on fresh produce and deli offerings on top of its low prices and wide assortment. The question for Loblaw's executive team was whether or not to make any strategic changes, and, if so, in what direction.


Case Authors : Kenneth G. Hardy, Veronika Papyrina

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Marketing, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010643) -10010643 - -
Year 1 3452892 -6557751 3452892 0.9434 3257445
Year 2 3971780 -2585971 7424672 0.89 3534870
Year 3 3965865 1379894 11390537 0.8396 3329817
Year 4 3237728 4617622 14628265 0.7921 2564584
TOTAL 14628265 12686716




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676073

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Loblaw Superstores have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Loblaw Superstores shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Loblaw Superstores often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Loblaw Superstores needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010643) -10010643 - -
Year 1 3452892 -6557751 3452892 0.8696 3002515
Year 2 3971780 -2585971 7424672 0.7561 3003236
Year 3 3965865 1379894 11390537 0.6575 2607621
Year 4 3237728 4617622 14628265 0.5718 1851181
TOTAL 10464553


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453910

(10464553 - 10010643 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010643) -10010643 - -
Year 1 3452892 -6557751 3452892 0.8333 2877410
Year 2 3971780 -2585971 7424672 0.6944 2758181
Year 3 3965865 1379894 11390537 0.5787 2295061
Year 4 3237728 4617622 14628265 0.4823 1561404
TOTAL 9492056


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518587

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492056 - 10010643 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Loblaw Superstores to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Loblaw Superstores has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Loblaw Superstores can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Loblaw Superstores, then the stock price of the Loblaw Superstores should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Loblaw Superstores should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters

References & Further Readings

Kenneth G. Hardy, Veronika Papyrina (2018), "Loblaw Companies Limited: Preparing for Wal-Mart Supercenters Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hawkins SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Foryou SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Wockhardt SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


KCAP Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Neurotech Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Okamoto Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Airex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Safety Godown SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Power Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Zhejiang Shangfeng Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls