×




Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David P. Stowell, Christopher D Grogan. The Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette (referred as “Gillette Kilts” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Financial management, Intellectual property, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette Case Study


January 27, 2005, was an extraordinary day for Gillette's James Kilts, the show-stopping turnaround expert known as the "Razor Boss of Boston." Kilts, along with Procter & Gamble chairman Alan Lafley, had just orchestrated a $57 billion acquisition of Gillette by P&G. The creation of the world's largest consumer products company would end Kilts's four-year tenure as CEO of Gillette and bring to a close Gillette's 104-year history as an independent corporate titan in the Boston area. The deal also capped a series of courtships between Gillette and other companies that had waxed and waned at various points throughout Kilts's stewardship of Gillette. But almost immediately after the transaction was announced, P&G and Gillette drew criticism from the media and the state of Massachusetts concerning the terms of the sale. Would this merger actually benefit shareholders, or was it principally a wealth creation vehicle for Kilts?


Case Authors : David P. Stowell, Christopher D Grogan

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Financial management, Intellectual property, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021543) -10021543 - -
Year 1 3451311 -6570232 3451311 0.9434 3255954
Year 2 3961090 -2609142 7412401 0.89 3525356
Year 3 3973724 1364582 11386125 0.8396 3336415
Year 4 3229840 4594422 14615965 0.7921 2558336
TOTAL 14615965 12676061




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654518

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gillette Kilts shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gillette Kilts have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gillette Kilts often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gillette Kilts needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021543) -10021543 - -
Year 1 3451311 -6570232 3451311 0.8696 3001140
Year 2 3961090 -2609142 7412401 0.7561 2995153
Year 3 3973724 1364582 11386125 0.6575 2612788
Year 4 3229840 4594422 14615965 0.5718 1846672
TOTAL 10455753


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434210

(10455753 - 10021543 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021543) -10021543 - -
Year 1 3451311 -6570232 3451311 0.8333 2876093
Year 2 3961090 -2609142 7412401 0.6944 2750757
Year 3 3973724 1364582 11386125 0.5787 2299609
Year 4 3229840 4594422 14615965 0.4823 1557600
TOTAL 9484059


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537484

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484059 - 10021543 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gillette Kilts to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gillette Kilts has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gillette Kilts can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gillette Kilts, then the stock price of the Gillette Kilts should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gillette Kilts should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette

References & Further Readings

David P. Stowell, Christopher D Grogan (2018), "Best Deal Gillette Could Get? Procter & Gamble's Acquisition of Gillette Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


GeoPark Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Easun Reyrolle Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Hunter Hall Global Value SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Regina Miracle Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Songzhi Aircon A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Polar Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Oncimmune Holdings PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


RigNet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Covivio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations