×




Teradyne Japan Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Teradyne Japan case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Teradyne Japan case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Y. Yoshino, Thomas W. Malnight. The Teradyne Japan (referred as “Japan Subsidiary” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competition, Growth strategy, International business, Mergers & acquisitions, Operations management, Organizational structure, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Teradyne Japan Case Study


Describes a parent-subsidiary relationship in the high technology industry. The subsidiary, located in Japan, has been expanding its activities throughout the 1980s in the face of stiff local competition. Examines the dilemma facing corporate and country management as to the proper role of each respective organization in building the company's business. Some critical issues include communications across functions in a high technology environment and deciding how to build a successful business in Japan.


Case Authors : Michael Y. Yoshino, Thomas W. Malnight

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competition, Growth strategy, International business, Mergers & acquisitions, Operations management, Organizational structure, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Teradyne Japan Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029811) -10029811 - -
Year 1 3452685 -6577126 3452685 0.9434 3257250
Year 2 3960574 -2616552 7413259 0.89 3524897
Year 3 3941572 1325020 11354831 0.8396 3309420
Year 4 3225083 4550103 14579914 0.7921 2554568
TOTAL 14579914 12646134




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2616323

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Japan Subsidiary have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Japan Subsidiary shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Teradyne Japan

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Japan Subsidiary often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Japan Subsidiary needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029811) -10029811 - -
Year 1 3452685 -6577126 3452685 0.8696 3002335
Year 2 3960574 -2616552 7413259 0.7561 2994763
Year 3 3941572 1325020 11354831 0.6575 2591648
Year 4 3225083 4550103 14579914 0.5718 1843952
TOTAL 10432697


The Net NPV after 4 years is 402886

(10432697 - 10029811 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029811) -10029811 - -
Year 1 3452685 -6577126 3452685 0.8333 2877238
Year 2 3960574 -2616552 7413259 0.6944 2750399
Year 3 3941572 1325020 11354831 0.5787 2281002
Year 4 3225083 4550103 14579914 0.4823 1555306
TOTAL 9463945


The Net NPV after 4 years is -565866

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9463945 - 10029811 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Japan Subsidiary to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Japan Subsidiary has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Japan Subsidiary can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Japan Subsidiary, then the stock price of the Japan Subsidiary should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Japan Subsidiary should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Teradyne Japan

References & Further Readings

Michael Y. Yoshino, Thomas W. Malnight (2018), "Teradyne Japan Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


PFB Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


3SBio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Jiangxi Huangshanghuang Food A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Jupiter European SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


W.H.Ireland SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Dana Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Groupe Open SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services