Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza. The Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) (referred as “Fab Intel” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) Case Study

Describes the highly complex strategic and financial considerations Intel's CEO must take into account in deciding whether and where to build a state-of-the-art microprocessor factory (known as a "fab"). Specifically, examines a fab location decision made by Intel in 2002, where it faced mounting pressures and attractive subsidies to locate a state-of-the-art fab in Asia. Intel must balance purely financial considerations with strategic considerations, such as the impact of the location of a new fab on its existing network of plants, as well as the geopolitical concerns of the governments of the United States, China, and others. Includes the voices of key decision makers at Intel, including the CEO, CFO, and head of manufacturing.

Case Authors : Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Strategic planning

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009741)	-10009741	-	-
Year 1	3466293	-6543448	3466293	0.9434	3270088
Year 2	3979525	-2563923	7445818	0.89	3541763
Year 3	3951875	1387952	11397693	0.8396	3318070
Year 4	3247481	4635433	14645174	0.7921	2572309
TOTAL			14645174		12702230

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2692489

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fab Intel shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fab Intel have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fab Intel often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fab Intel needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009741)	-10009741	-	-
Year 1	3466293	-6543448	3466293	0.8696	3014168
Year 2	3979525	-2563923	7445818	0.7561	3009093
Year 3	3951875	1387952	11397693	0.6575	2598422
Year 4	3247481	4635433	14645174	0.5718	1856758
TOTAL					10478440

The Net NPV after 4 years is 468699

(10478440 - 10009741 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009741)	-10009741	-	-
Year 1	3466293	-6543448	3466293	0.8333	2888578
Year 2	3979525	-2563923	7445818	0.6944	2763559
Year 3	3951875	1387952	11397693	0.5787	2286965
Year 4	3247481	4635433	14645174	0.4823	1566108
TOTAL					9505209

The Net NPV after 4 years is -504532

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505209 - 10009741 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fab Intel to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fab Intel has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fab Intel can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fab Intel, then the stock price of the Fab Intel should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fab Intel should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A)

References & Further Readings

Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza (2018), "Interplay of Strategy and Finance at Intel: The Fab Location Decision (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.