×




Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Brian S. Silverman, Mark Rosenberg. The Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy (referred as “Solaris Microsystems” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competition, Intellectual property, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy Case Study


In the late 1990s, Sun Microsystems' Solaris has emerged as the dominant UNIX-based alternative to Microsoft for server operating systems. At the same time, the open source operating system Linux has appeared unexpectedly, and it is generating significant excitement among programmers and users. Anil Gadre, vice president and general manager of Sun's Solaris Operating Environment Group, must assess the threats and opportunities posed by Linux and by Microsoft as he and his executive team formulate a strategic plan for Solaris.


Case Authors : Brian S. Silverman, Mark Rosenberg

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competition, Intellectual property, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003420) -10003420 - -
Year 1 3453112 -6550308 3453112 0.9434 3257653
Year 2 3970008 -2580300 7423120 0.89 3533293
Year 3 3962374 1382074 11385494 0.8396 3326886
Year 4 3233985 4616059 14619479 0.7921 2561619
TOTAL 14619479 12679450




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676030

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Solaris Microsystems have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Solaris Microsystems shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Solaris Microsystems often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Solaris Microsystems needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003420) -10003420 - -
Year 1 3453112 -6550308 3453112 0.8696 3002706
Year 2 3970008 -2580300 7423120 0.7561 3001896
Year 3 3962374 1382074 11385494 0.6575 2605325
Year 4 3233985 4616059 14619479 0.5718 1849041
TOTAL 10458969


The Net NPV after 4 years is 455549

(10458969 - 10003420 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003420) -10003420 - -
Year 1 3453112 -6550308 3453112 0.8333 2877593
Year 2 3970008 -2580300 7423120 0.6944 2756950
Year 3 3962374 1382074 11385494 0.5787 2293041
Year 4 3233985 4616059 14619479 0.4823 1559599
TOTAL 9487183


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516237

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487183 - 10003420 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Solaris Microsystems to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Solaris Microsystems has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Solaris Microsystems can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Solaris Microsystems, then the stock price of the Solaris Microsystems should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Solaris Microsystems should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy

References & Further Readings

Brian S. Silverman, Mark Rosenberg (2018), "Sun Microsystems, Inc: Solaris Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Silla SG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Natural Health Trend SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


REN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Leo Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Roche Bobois SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


KG Mobilians SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Capilano Honey Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing