×




Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael G. Rukstad, Tyrrell Levine, Carl Johnston. The Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" (referred as “Breakup Copy” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions, Reorganization, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" Case Study


This case is available in only hard copy format (HBP does not have digital distribution rights to the content). As a result, a digital Educator Copy of the case is not available through this web site.Focuses on AT&T's 2000 restructuring, in which the company broke itself into four units: business services, consumer services, broadband, and wireless. Examines the strategy of the company during this time: (1) to deliver information in any form (voice, video, data) over any distance to any place in the world; (2) its numerous acquisitions to implement its strategy; and, (3) the reasons underlying the breakup. Describes the benefits of restructuring and how the company planned to maintain relationships among the units through contractual arrangements.


Case Authors : Michael G. Rukstad, Tyrrell Levine, Carl Johnston

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions, Reorganization, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022195) -10022195 - -
Year 1 3459715 -6562480 3459715 0.9434 3263882
Year 2 3982886 -2579594 7442601 0.89 3544754
Year 3 3938681 1359087 11381282 0.8396 3306993
Year 4 3247806 4606893 14629088 0.7921 2572567
TOTAL 14629088 12688196




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666001

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Breakup Copy shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Breakup Copy have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam"

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Breakup Copy often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Breakup Copy needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022195) -10022195 - -
Year 1 3459715 -6562480 3459715 0.8696 3008448
Year 2 3982886 -2579594 7442601 0.7561 3011634
Year 3 3938681 1359087 11381282 0.6575 2589747
Year 4 3247806 4606893 14629088 0.5718 1856944
TOTAL 10466772


The Net NPV after 4 years is 444577

(10466772 - 10022195 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022195) -10022195 - -
Year 1 3459715 -6562480 3459715 0.8333 2883096
Year 2 3982886 -2579594 7442601 0.6944 2765893
Year 3 3938681 1359087 11381282 0.5787 2279329
Year 4 3247806 4606893 14629088 0.4823 1566264
TOTAL 9494583


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527612

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494583 - 10022195 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Breakup Copy to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Breakup Copy has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Breakup Copy can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Breakup Copy, then the stock price of the Breakup Copy should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Breakup Copy should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam"

References & Further Readings

Michael G. Rukstad, Tyrrell Levine, Carl Johnston (2018), "Breakup of AT&T: Project "Grand Slam" Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


artec technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


DMS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Advertising


Jia Yao SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


UOL Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Fairchem Speciality SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


V V Food & Beverage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing