×




Emerging Nokia? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Emerging Nokia? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Emerging Nokia? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Juan Alcacer, Tarun Khanna, Mary Furey, Rakeen Mabud. The Emerging Nokia? (referred as “Nokia Emerging” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Emerging markets, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Emerging Nokia? Case Study


By late 2009, Nokia was grappling with the decision of whether to recover its leading position in the high-profit developed markets, where they were losing market share to the likes of Apple and Samsung, or defend its market leadership in the low-margin, high-volume emerging markets. This case poses the following questions: Should Nokia stay the course, operating in both the developed and emerging markets, or should they forego one for the other? And what would this imply for the types of handsets and services they would need to offer?


Case Authors : Juan Alcacer, Tarun Khanna, Mary Furey, Rakeen Mabud

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Emerging markets, Innovation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Emerging Nokia? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028179) -10028179 - -
Year 1 3468321 -6559858 3468321 0.9434 3272001
Year 2 3964267 -2595591 7432588 0.89 3528184
Year 3 3947030 1351439 11379618 0.8396 3314002
Year 4 3224102 4575541 14603720 0.7921 2553791
TOTAL 14603720 12667978




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2639799

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nokia Emerging shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nokia Emerging have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Emerging Nokia?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nokia Emerging often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nokia Emerging needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028179) -10028179 - -
Year 1 3468321 -6559858 3468321 0.8696 3015931
Year 2 3964267 -2595591 7432588 0.7561 2997555
Year 3 3947030 1351439 11379618 0.6575 2595236
Year 4 3224102 4575541 14603720 0.5718 1843391
TOTAL 10452114


The Net NPV after 4 years is 423935

(10452114 - 10028179 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028179) -10028179 - -
Year 1 3468321 -6559858 3468321 0.8333 2890268
Year 2 3964267 -2595591 7432588 0.6944 2752963
Year 3 3947030 1351439 11379618 0.5787 2284161
Year 4 3224102 4575541 14603720 0.4823 1554833
TOTAL 9482225


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545954

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482225 - 10028179 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nokia Emerging to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nokia Emerging has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nokia Emerging can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nokia Emerging, then the stock price of the Nokia Emerging should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nokia Emerging should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Emerging Nokia?

References & Further Readings

Juan Alcacer, Tarun Khanna, Mary Furey, Rakeen Mabud (2018), "Emerging Nokia? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bonduelle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Tian Jin Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Luna SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Imuraya Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


NetSol SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Agios Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


HKR International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ichigo Hotel REIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services