×




The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jared Harris, Mike Lenox, Rebecca Goldberg. The The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines (referred as “Logan Jetblue” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines Case Study


JetBlue Airways is only five days away from entering the Boston market by establishing a presence at Logan International Airport. The VP of strategy for JetBlue considers the range of potential competitive responses that he might expect from such established airlines as American Airlines, so he can anticipate and prepare. As the largest major carrier operating out of Logan, American had more at risk than the other major carriers and had not yet decided how best to compete with the LCCs. How would American respond?


Case Authors : Jared Harris, Mike Lenox, Rebecca Goldberg

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001807) -10001807 - -
Year 1 3466199 -6535608 3466199 0.9434 3269999
Year 2 3956891 -2578717 7423090 0.89 3521619
Year 3 3943812 1365095 11366902 0.8396 3311301
Year 4 3241200 4606295 14608102 0.7921 2567334
TOTAL 14608102 12670253




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668446

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Logan Jetblue have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Logan Jetblue shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Logan Jetblue often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Logan Jetblue needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001807) -10001807 - -
Year 1 3466199 -6535608 3466199 0.8696 3014086
Year 2 3956891 -2578717 7423090 0.7561 2991978
Year 3 3943812 1365095 11366902 0.6575 2593120
Year 4 3241200 4606295 14608102 0.5718 1853167
TOTAL 10452351


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450544

(10452351 - 10001807 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001807) -10001807 - -
Year 1 3466199 -6535608 3466199 0.8333 2888499
Year 2 3956891 -2578717 7423090 0.6944 2747841
Year 3 3943812 1365095 11366902 0.5787 2282299
Year 4 3241200 4606295 14608102 0.4823 1563079
TOTAL 9481717


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520090

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481717 - 10001807 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Logan Jetblue to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Logan Jetblue has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Logan Jetblue can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Logan Jetblue, then the stock price of the Logan Jetblue should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Logan Jetblue should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines

References & Further Readings

Jared Harris, Mike Lenox, Rebecca Goldberg (2018), "The Battle for Logan Airport: JetBlue Airways versus American Airlines Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Ebara Jitsugyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Neuralstem SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


DK-Lok SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Kodiak Sciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Munjal Auto Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Mobilicom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Kayne Anderson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Horizon North Logistics Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Poly Real Estate Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kimura Chemical Plants SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods