×




Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Erica Berte, Christine Vujovich. The Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. (referred as “Cummins Decree” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Corporate governance, Organizational culture, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. Case Study


In 1998, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel engines signed a consent decree which included among other things, pulling forward ("pull ahead") by 15 months a new nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standard. By early 2002, Caterpillar and Detroit Diesel were requesting EPA to delay the "pull ahead". Cummins was being pressured by its competitors to join in this request. On the other side, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and several environmental organizations wanted Cummins to adhere to the requirements of the consent decree. Cummins was navigating through a very difficult economic time and could not afford to make a mistake. Joe Loughrey, Cummins Engine Business President and his team needed to make a strategic decision. Would they a) agree with the competitors' position asking EPA to delay the consent decree which required the company to pull ahead an expensive environment requirement, thus allowing manufacturers to continue using the established engine technology that had customer support, or b) accept the terms of the consent decree and continue to develop a new engine technology against the wishes of many in the industry and thus face possible market retraction. Both strategic decision options had substantial consequences and needed to be carefully evaluated. Not only was the future of Cummins Engine Business in jeopardy, but as we learn later, this decision impacted the future of the whole industry.


Case Authors : Erica Berte, Christine Vujovich

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Corporate governance, Organizational culture, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008276) -10008276 - -
Year 1 3444304 -6563972 3444304 0.9434 3249343
Year 2 3958460 -2605512 7402764 0.89 3523015
Year 3 3942052 1336540 11344816 0.8396 3309823
Year 4 3248787 4585327 14593603 0.7921 2573344
TOTAL 14593603 12655525




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647249

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cummins Decree shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cummins Decree have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cummins Decree often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cummins Decree needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008276) -10008276 - -
Year 1 3444304 -6563972 3444304 0.8696 2995047
Year 2 3958460 -2605512 7402764 0.7561 2993164
Year 3 3942052 1336540 11344816 0.6575 2591963
Year 4 3248787 4585327 14593603 0.5718 1857505
TOTAL 10437679


The Net NPV after 4 years is 429403

(10437679 - 10008276 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008276) -10008276 - -
Year 1 3444304 -6563972 3444304 0.8333 2870253
Year 2 3958460 -2605512 7402764 0.6944 2748931
Year 3 3942052 1336540 11344816 0.5787 2281280
Year 4 3248787 4585327 14593603 0.4823 1566738
TOTAL 9467202


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541074

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9467202 - 10008276 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cummins Decree to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cummins Decree has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cummins Decree can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cummins Decree, then the stock price of the Cummins Decree should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cummins Decree should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision.

References & Further Readings

Erica Berte, Christine Vujovich (2018), "Balancing Stakeholder Interests and Corporate Values: A Cummins Strategic Decision. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Orient Bell Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


International Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


BRP Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Conglomerates , Conglomerates


Western Forest Products Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Digitalx SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Hyosung Heavy Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls