×




Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Marks, Chuck Holloway, Hau Lee, David W. Hoyt. The Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage (referred as “Crocs Season” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing, Strategy, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage Case Study


This case discusses the astounding growth of Crocs, Inc., a manufacturer of plastic shoes, from 2003 through early 2007. Much of the company's growth was made possible by a highly flexible supply chain that enabled Crocs to build additional product within the selling season. The normal model used within the fashion industry was to take orders well in advance of each selling season, and produce to those orders, with relatively little additional production. If demand was far in excess of this production, there would be stockouts and the company would lose the ability to capture revenue for that season. The product might or might not be in fashion the following year, when production would again be based on preseason orders. Crocs' ability to build additional shoes within the season enabled it to take advantage of strong customer demand, resulting in the company filling in-season orders totaling many times that of the initial prebooked orders. The case describes the Crocs supply chain. It asks students to assess the company's core competencies and how those can be exploited in the future. The case was revised in March 2011 to present information on the company's results in 2007 and prepare students for discussions of problems that would be faced in 2008 (covered in the B and C cases).


Case Authors : Michael Marks, Chuck Holloway, Hau Lee, David W. Hoyt

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Manufacturing, Strategy, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020725) -10020725 - -
Year 1 3449906 -6570819 3449906 0.9434 3254628
Year 2 3973507 -2597312 7423413 0.89 3536407
Year 3 3967701 1370389 11391114 0.8396 3331358
Year 4 3234938 4605327 14626052 0.7921 2562374
TOTAL 14626052 12684768




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2664043

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Crocs Season have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Crocs Season shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Crocs Season often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Crocs Season needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020725) -10020725 - -
Year 1 3449906 -6570819 3449906 0.8696 2999918
Year 2 3973507 -2597312 7423413 0.7561 3004542
Year 3 3967701 1370389 11391114 0.6575 2608828
Year 4 3234938 4605327 14626052 0.5718 1849586
TOTAL 10462875


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442150

(10462875 - 10020725 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020725) -10020725 - -
Year 1 3449906 -6570819 3449906 0.8333 2874922
Year 2 3973507 -2597312 7423413 0.6944 2759380
Year 3 3967701 1370389 11391114 0.5787 2296123
Year 4 3234938 4605327 14626052 0.4823 1560059
TOTAL 9490484


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530241

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490484 - 10020725 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Crocs Season to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Crocs Season has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Crocs Season can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Crocs Season, then the stock price of the Crocs Season should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Crocs Season should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage

References & Further Readings

Michael Marks, Chuck Holloway, Hau Lee, David W. Hoyt (2018), "Crocs (A): Revolutionizing an Industry's Supply Chain Model for Competitive Advantage Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Logistec SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Kalray SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Melbourne Enterprises SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


AFH Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Musashino Kogyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


DCM Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Rock Paint SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Evergrande Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Northrim SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Diamond Offshore Drilling SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment