×




Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by James K. Sebenius, Ellen Knebel. The Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) (referred as “Bollingers Case.an” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) Case Study


Supplements the (A) case.An abstract is not available for this product.


Case Authors : James K. Sebenius, Ellen Knebel

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013666) -10013666 - -
Year 1 3443994 -6569672 3443994 0.9434 3249051
Year 2 3965010 -2604662 7409004 0.89 3528845
Year 3 3940275 1335613 11349279 0.8396 3308331
Year 4 3237711 4573324 14586990 0.7921 2564570
TOTAL 14586990 12650797




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2637131

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bollingers Case.an shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bollingers Case.an have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bollingers Case.an often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bollingers Case.an needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013666) -10013666 - -
Year 1 3443994 -6569672 3443994 0.8696 2994777
Year 2 3965010 -2604662 7409004 0.7561 2998117
Year 3 3940275 1335613 11349279 0.6575 2590795
Year 4 3237711 4573324 14586990 0.5718 1851172
TOTAL 10434861


The Net NPV after 4 years is 421195

(10434861 - 10013666 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013666) -10013666 - -
Year 1 3443994 -6569672 3443994 0.8333 2869995
Year 2 3965010 -2604662 7409004 0.6944 2753479
Year 3 3940275 1335613 11349279 0.5787 2280252
Year 4 3237711 4573324 14586990 0.4823 1561396
TOTAL 9465122


The Net NPV after 4 years is -548544

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9465122 - 10013666 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bollingers Case.an to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bollingers Case.an has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bollingers Case.an can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bollingers Case.an, then the stock price of the Bollingers Case.an should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bollingers Case.an should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B)

References & Further Readings

James K. Sebenius, Ellen Knebel (2018), "Bollingers: Negotiating with Wal-Mart (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Highwoods Properties SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Kstar Science A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Fibrocell Science SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Ascopiave SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


TOC Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Prime People SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Jiangsu Linyang Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


GSS Infotech Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Alpha Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Lee & Man Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing