Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Tarun Khanna, Samuli Skurnik, Jordan Mitchell. The Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail (referred as “Kesko Cooperatives” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Competition, Corporate governance, Marketing, Operations management, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail Case Study

To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.The case looks at the two dominant Finnish retailers: S Group and Kesko. S Group is a customer-owned cooperative, which has a unique holding structure whereby 1.7 million residents (or 70 percent of Finnish households) own 22 regional cooperatives. In turn, the regional cooperatives own SOK, a centralized company that provides services to the regional cooperatives. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, S Group lagged far behind the market leader, Kesko. However, since 2005, S Group has held the leadership position; in 2007, it had captured 41 percent market while Kesko's was 33.9 percent. Kesko Plc is publicly traded and pursues a model whereby retailer entrepreneurs use their personal funds to invest in stores and operate them completely. The case requires that students consider sources of competitive advantage that arise from the companies' markedly different business models.

Case Authors : Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Tarun Khanna, Samuli Skurnik, Jordan Mitchell

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Collaboration, Competition, Corporate governance, Marketing, Operations management, Organizational structure

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10021865)	-10021865	-	-
Year 1	3455346	-6566519	3455346	0.9434	3259760
Year 2	3973237	-2593282	7428583	0.89	3536167
Year 3	3943497	1350215	11372080	0.8396	3311036
Year 4	3239361	4589576	14611441	0.7921	2565877
TOTAL			14611441		12672841

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650976

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kesko Cooperatives shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kesko Cooperatives have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kesko Cooperatives often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kesko Cooperatives needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10021865)	-10021865	-	-
Year 1	3455346	-6566519	3455346	0.8696	3004649
Year 2	3973237	-2593282	7428583	0.7561	3004338
Year 3	3943497	1350215	11372080	0.6575	2592913
Year 4	3239361	4589576	14611441	0.5718	1852115
TOTAL					10454015

The Net NPV after 4 years is 432150

(10454015 - 10021865 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10021865)	-10021865	-	-
Year 1	3455346	-6566519	3455346	0.8333	2879455
Year 2	3973237	-2593282	7428583	0.6944	2759192
Year 3	3943497	1350215	11372080	0.5787	2282116
Year 4	3239361	4589576	14611441	0.4823	1562192
TOTAL					9482956

The Net NPV after 4 years is -538909

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482956 - 10021865 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kesko Cooperatives to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kesko Cooperatives has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kesko Cooperatives can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kesko Cooperatives, then the stock price of the Kesko Cooperatives should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kesko Cooperatives should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail

References & Further Readings

Ramon Casadesus-Masanell, Tarun Khanna, Samuli Skurnik, Jordan Mitchell (2018), "Finland's S Group: Competing with a Cooperative Approach to Retail Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.