×




PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Henry Lippincott. The PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape (referred as “Paypal Payments” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Innovation, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape Case Study


The case follows PayPal, a digital payments platform that found early success processing online payments for purchases on eBay, which acquired the company in 2002. The case begins by describing the decision by eBay in 2014 to spin off PayPal and the strategic challenges facing its new CEO, Dan Schulman, who encountered significant strategic issues leading PayPal as an independent company. When the separation from eBay finalized in July 2015, PayPal was in the midst of a multi-year technology reconstruction. Additionally, the digital payments landscape had changed dramatically, extending beyond eCommerce into mobile payments, global remittances, peer-to-peer transfers, and offline transactions. The case presents several trials facing Schulman, including how to innovate quickly in a large organization, whether and how to recreate PayPal's vision, and how to both partner and compete successfully with new entrants in the market.


Case Authors : Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Henry Lippincott

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Globalization, Innovation, Mergers & acquisitions, Organizational structure, Reorganization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004402) -10004402 - -
Year 1 3462958 -6541444 3462958 0.9434 3266942
Year 2 3977834 -2563610 7440792 0.89 3540258
Year 3 3949407 1385797 11390199 0.8396 3315998
Year 4 3251535 4637332 14641734 0.7921 2575520
TOTAL 14641734 12698718




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2694316

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Paypal Payments have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Paypal Payments shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Paypal Payments often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Paypal Payments needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004402) -10004402 - -
Year 1 3462958 -6541444 3462958 0.8696 3011268
Year 2 3977834 -2563610 7440792 0.7561 3007814
Year 3 3949407 1385797 11390199 0.6575 2596799
Year 4 3251535 4637332 14641734 0.5718 1859076
TOTAL 10474957


The Net NPV after 4 years is 470555

(10474957 - 10004402 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004402) -10004402 - -
Year 1 3462958 -6541444 3462958 0.8333 2885798
Year 2 3977834 -2563610 7440792 0.6944 2762385
Year 3 3949407 1385797 11390199 0.5787 2285536
Year 4 3251535 4637332 14641734 0.4823 1568063
TOTAL 9501782


The Net NPV after 4 years is -502620

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501782 - 10004402 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Paypal Payments to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Paypal Payments has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Paypal Payments can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Paypal Payments, then the stock price of the Paypal Payments should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Paypal Payments should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape

References & Further Readings

Robert Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Henry Lippincott (2018), "PayPal in 2015: Reshaping the Financial Services Landscape Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Manitowoc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Galore Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Rockhopper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Healthcare Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Anheuser Busch Inbev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Medpace Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging