×




Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yvonne Chong, A. Lee Gilbert. The Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets (referred as “Sembcorp Utilities” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Government, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets Case Study


Sembcorp Industries, a Singapore conglomerate with assets of over S$22 billion, was undergoing a change in leadership. Tang Kin Fei retired as group president and CEO in April 2017 after 30 years with the company. Overseas operations accounted for 63% of their Utilities business' net profit, which formed the bulk of group earnings in 2016. Sembcorp's global power portfolio had doubled in the last five years. Rapidly developing economies, hungry for energy to fuel growth and urbanisation, were their key targets. There were growing concerns on the execution risks of developing a project pipeline in these markets and the environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges involved. Sustaining their growth path might not simply be a matter of building on past success and replicating their business model overseas. How would they manage the inherent risks and complexities of the emerging markets, namely India, Bangladesh, Myanmar and China, albeit ripe with opportunities?


Case Authors : Yvonne Chong, A. Lee Gilbert

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Government, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003600) -10003600 - -
Year 1 3453083 -6550517 3453083 0.9434 3257625
Year 2 3975767 -2574750 7428850 0.89 3538418
Year 3 3956965 1382215 11385815 0.8396 3322344
Year 4 3234611 4616826 14620426 0.7921 2562115
TOTAL 14620426 12680503




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676903

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sembcorp Utilities have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sembcorp Utilities shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sembcorp Utilities often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sembcorp Utilities needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003600) -10003600 - -
Year 1 3453083 -6550517 3453083 0.8696 3002681
Year 2 3975767 -2574750 7428850 0.7561 3006251
Year 3 3956965 1382215 11385815 0.6575 2601769
Year 4 3234611 4616826 14620426 0.5718 1849399
TOTAL 10460100


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456500

(10460100 - 10003600 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003600) -10003600 - -
Year 1 3453083 -6550517 3453083 0.8333 2877569
Year 2 3975767 -2574750 7428850 0.6944 2760949
Year 3 3956965 1382215 11385815 0.5787 2289910
Year 4 3234611 4616826 14620426 0.4823 1559901
TOTAL 9488330


The Net NPV after 4 years is -515270

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488330 - 10003600 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sembcorp Utilities to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sembcorp Utilities has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sembcorp Utilities can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sembcorp Utilities, then the stock price of the Sembcorp Utilities should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sembcorp Utilities should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets

References & Further Readings

Yvonne Chong, A. Lee Gilbert (2018), "Sembcorp Utilities: Powering Sustainable Growth in Emerging Markets Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


BlackRock Maryl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Wellco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing Services


Iofina SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Gpro Titanium A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Tecnon Fujianmmercial Lighting SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Assertio Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Nanosphere Health SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs