×




Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Snehal Awate, Ram Mudambi, Arohini Narain. The Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited (referred as “Suzlon's Suzlon” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Influence.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited Case Study


Set in 2013, the case documents the challenges encountered by an emerging economy multinational enterprise (EMNE) when accessing R&D knowledge from its technologically superior subsidiary. Further, it shows the strategies that Suzlon, an Indian wind turbine manufacturer, adopted to catch up with global industry leaders. It tracks how Suzlon's astute and aggressive chairman, Tulsi Tanti, led the company to develop the capabilities to perform higher value added activities despite being a late industry entrant and one, moreover, from an emerging economy. The setting for the case is the global wind power industry, an emerging high-tech industry. The case thus shows that EMNEs are entering and succeeding not only in mature industries but also in newly emerging industries. By acquiring technologically superior firms, Suzlon made a mark in the global wind power industry dominated by European and American companies. While most of its acquisitions successfully served their purpose, Suzlon's 2007 acquisition of the German wind turbine manufacturer REpower did not go as planned. REpower was a technology-focused firm with expertise in large offshore turbines. Suzlon's goal was to access REpower's technology and combine it with Suzlon's low manufacturing cost and operational efficiency to gain competitive advantage over rivals. However, the expected knowledge transfer from this acquisition did not materialize as quickly as planned due to REpower's refusal to share its technology with its parent, Suzlon. The case primarily describes the challenges involved in this acquisition, amplified by the economic recession of 2008. It shows Tanti's attempts to make the acquisition work by balancing the "power" struggle between the Indian parent and the German subsidiary. Further, by tracking Suzlon right from its inception, it also describes Suzlon's catch-up strategies to emerge as a market leader in India and the fifth largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world.


Case Authors : Snehal Awate, Ram Mudambi, Arohini Narain

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Influence




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029774) -10029774 - -
Year 1 3450940 -6578834 3450940 0.9434 3255604
Year 2 3962862 -2615972 7413802 0.89 3526933
Year 3 3972189 1356217 11385991 0.8396 3335126
Year 4 3235833 4592050 14621824 0.7921 2563083
TOTAL 14621824 12680746




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650972

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Suzlon's Suzlon shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Suzlon's Suzlon have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Suzlon's Suzlon often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Suzlon's Suzlon needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029774) -10029774 - -
Year 1 3450940 -6578834 3450940 0.8696 3000817
Year 2 3962862 -2615972 7413802 0.7561 2996493
Year 3 3972189 1356217 11385991 0.6575 2611779
Year 4 3235833 4592050 14621824 0.5718 1850098
TOTAL 10459187


The Net NPV after 4 years is 429413

(10459187 - 10029774 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029774) -10029774 - -
Year 1 3450940 -6578834 3450940 0.8333 2875783
Year 2 3962862 -2615972 7413802 0.6944 2751988
Year 3 3972189 1356217 11385991 0.5787 2298720
Year 4 3235833 4592050 14621824 0.4823 1560490
TOTAL 9486982


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542792

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486982 - 10029774 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Suzlon's Suzlon to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Suzlon's Suzlon has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Suzlon's Suzlon can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Suzlon's Suzlon, then the stock price of the Suzlon's Suzlon should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Suzlon's Suzlon should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited

References & Further Readings

Snehal Awate, Ram Mudambi, Arohini Narain (2018), "Balancing the Power Equation: Suzlon Energy Limited Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Amiad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


CryoLife SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Indle Fin. Entrepr. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Tanyuan Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Africa Oil Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Jolimark SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


Guizhou Changzheng Tiancheng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Wakou Shokuhin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Fujian Funeng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


NTT Docomo, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services