×




Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Edward Gamble, Peter Moroz, Stewart Thornhill, Haley Beer. The Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! (referred as “Beanz Lori” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! Case Study


Beanz Espresso Bar is located in downtown Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. It is operating in a market with high rivalry (11 other coffee businesses in a two-block radius). The economy in Prince Edward Island has seen several diners, restaurants, and coffee shops close their doors within the past few years, while simultaneously drawing in large corporate businesses such as Starbucks and Running Room. Beanz has thus far survived the major environmental changes and managed to keep its clientele and the owners, Lori and Doug, feel it is time to either sell Beanz and leave the industry, or exploit their competitive advantages to grow and capture more market share. Beanz specializes in high-quality, baked-from-scratch food and specialty coffee beverages. The cafA? is known for its artistic vibe, warm atmosphere, and eccentric staff. After operating Beanz for 16 years, the couple has made few changes to the decor, menu, the set-up. Internally, the company faces several issues concerning management control systems, marketing, and strategic direction. Lori and Doug must choose between five different directions for the future of Beanz.


Case Authors : Edward Gamble, Peter Moroz, Stewart Thornhill, Haley Beer

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017503) -10017503 - -
Year 1 3462662 -6554841 3462662 0.9434 3266662
Year 2 3971832 -2583009 7434494 0.89 3534916
Year 3 3975185 1392176 11409679 0.8396 3337642
Year 4 3223788 4615964 14633467 0.7921 2553542
TOTAL 14633467 12692763




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2675260

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Beanz Lori have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Beanz Lori shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup!

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Beanz Lori often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Beanz Lori needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017503) -10017503 - -
Year 1 3462662 -6554841 3462662 0.8696 3011010
Year 2 3971832 -2583009 7434494 0.7561 3003276
Year 3 3975185 1392176 11409679 0.6575 2613749
Year 4 3223788 4615964 14633467 0.5718 1843211
TOTAL 10471246


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453743

(10471246 - 10017503 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017503) -10017503 - -
Year 1 3462662 -6554841 3462662 0.8333 2885552
Year 2 3971832 -2583009 7434494 0.6944 2758217
Year 3 3975185 1392176 11409679 0.5787 2300454
Year 4 3223788 4615964 14633467 0.4823 1554682
TOTAL 9498904


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518599

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498904 - 10017503 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Beanz Lori to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Beanz Lori has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Beanz Lori can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Beanz Lori, then the stock price of the Beanz Lori should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Beanz Lori should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup!

References & Further Readings

Edward Gamble, Peter Moroz, Stewart Thornhill, Haley Beer (2018), "Beanz Versus Starbucks: Personality in a Cup! Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hulamin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Nike SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Footwear


Hemispherx Biopharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Diamond Power Infrastructure SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Andritz AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Allot Communications SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Nuveen PA MVF SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tianma Microelec A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dan Form SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Dalian Bio-Chem SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Tableau Software SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming