×




Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Malcolm P. Baker, Lauren Barley. The Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO (referred as “Siebel Goldman” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Leadership, Regulation, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO Case Study


Mike Lawrie, the newly appointed CEO of Siebel Systems, considers a combination of growth and spending cuts to turn around the struggling software company. Focuses on the role of the chief financial officer, Ken Goldman, in corporate governance and compliance under Sarbanes-Oxley; in establishing a financial model for the firm; in operations and leadership; and in investor relations under Regulation FD. Goldman, who had presided over rapid growth at several other technology firms before joining Siebel three years earlier, must adapt to Siebel's new leadership and operating environment.


Case Authors : Malcolm P. Baker, Lauren Barley

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Leadership, Regulation, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029819) -10029819 - -
Year 1 3457230 -6572589 3457230 0.9434 3261538
Year 2 3966163 -2606426 7423393 0.89 3529871
Year 3 3973597 1367171 11396990 0.8396 3336309
Year 4 3225581 4592752 14622571 0.7921 2554962
TOTAL 14622571 12682680




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652861

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Siebel Goldman shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Siebel Goldman have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Siebel Goldman often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Siebel Goldman needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029819) -10029819 - -
Year 1 3457230 -6572589 3457230 0.8696 3006287
Year 2 3966163 -2606426 7423393 0.7561 2998989
Year 3 3973597 1367171 11396990 0.6575 2612705
Year 4 3225581 4592752 14622571 0.5718 1844236
TOTAL 10462217


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432398

(10462217 - 10029819 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029819) -10029819 - -
Year 1 3457230 -6572589 3457230 0.8333 2881025
Year 2 3966163 -2606426 7423393 0.6944 2754280
Year 3 3973597 1367171 11396990 0.5787 2299535
Year 4 3225581 4592752 14622571 0.4823 1555546
TOTAL 9490387


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539432

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490387 - 10029819 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Siebel Goldman to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Siebel Goldman has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Siebel Goldman can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Siebel Goldman, then the stock price of the Siebel Goldman should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Siebel Goldman should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO

References & Further Readings

Malcolm P. Baker, Lauren Barley (2018), "Siebel Systems: The Role of the CFO Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


ICICI Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Ikhmas Jaya Group Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Plato Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ibraco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Renasant SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


PETRORIO ON NM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Ionis Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs