×




LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Mazzeo, Greg Merkley. The LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage (referred as “Lego Friends” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Marketing, Operations management, Product development, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage Case Study


In December 2011 the Lego Group (TLG) announced the launch of Lego Friends, the company's sixth attempt to market a product to girls. Lego Friends, which was supported by a $40 million global marketing campaign, was designed to introduce the fun of building with Lego bricks to girls, who represented less than 10 percent of Lego's audience. The company's poorly executed brand extensions and move from free-form building sets to story-driven kits had nearly cost it its independence in 2004, so the launch of Lego Friends was strategically important. However, within hours of the product's appearance it was heavily criticized for reinforcing gender stereotypes and damaging the valuable Lego brand. JA?rgen Vig Knudstorp, CEO since 2004, had saved TLG and ushered in an era of sales growth with a series of successful strategic initiatives. Would Lego Friends be another addition to TLG's graveyard of failed products for girls, or would it prove popular and finally enable the company to double its sales and profits by reaching this segment?


Case Authors : Michael Mazzeo, Greg Merkley

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Marketing, Operations management, Product development, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001084) -10001084 - -
Year 1 3469555 -6531529 3469555 0.9434 3273165
Year 2 3960483 -2571046 7430038 0.89 3524816
Year 3 3961637 1390591 11391675 0.8396 3326267
Year 4 3238156 4628747 14629831 0.7921 2564923
TOTAL 14629831 12689171




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688087

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Lego Friends have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Lego Friends shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Lego Friends often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Lego Friends needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001084) -10001084 - -
Year 1 3469555 -6531529 3469555 0.8696 3017004
Year 2 3960483 -2571046 7430038 0.7561 2994694
Year 3 3961637 1390591 11391675 0.6575 2604841
Year 4 3238156 4628747 14629831 0.5718 1851426
TOTAL 10467965


The Net NPV after 4 years is 466881

(10467965 - 10001084 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001084) -10001084 - -
Year 1 3469555 -6531529 3469555 0.8333 2891296
Year 2 3960483 -2571046 7430038 0.6944 2750335
Year 3 3961637 1390591 11391675 0.5787 2292614
Year 4 3238156 4628747 14629831 0.4823 1561611
TOTAL 9495856


The Net NPV after 4 years is -505228

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495856 - 10001084 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Lego Friends to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Lego Friends has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Lego Friends can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Lego Friends, then the stock price of the Lego Friends should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Lego Friends should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage

References & Further Readings

Michael Mazzeo, Greg Merkley (2018), "LEGOA? Friends: Leveraging Competitive Advantage Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Valener Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


ST Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Location Based Techs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Dyadic International SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Gromutual SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Gase Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Cabnet Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Seronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Silver Mines Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Hyundai IBT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Auctus Alternative SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming