Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Peter M. Senge, Goran Carstedt. The Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution (referred as “Carstedt Postindustrial” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Change management, Innovation, Internet, Sustainability, Transparency.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution Case Study

This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. In many ways, the Industrial Age has been an era of harvesting natural and social capital to create financial and productive capital. So far, the New Economy looks more like the next wave of the industrial era than a truly postindustrial one. Why should we care? Because, say the authors, the basic development patterns of the industrial era are not sustainable. In the face of this challenge, organizational learning expert Peter Senge and former Volvo and IKEA senior executive Goran Carstedt hail the emergence of a new environmentalism driven by innovation, not regulation--radical new technologies, products, processes, and business models. They describe how more and more companies are recognizing the business opportunities that a focus on sustainability creates. Such a shift in thinking is already evident in many companies and industries, where learning-organization principles are being applied to create sustainable business models. Simultaneously, they become inspirational, energetic places to work, where even relationships with customers and suppliers improve. Nonetheless, ecoefficiency alone will not create a truly postindustrial age: a strategy must consider how the economic system affects the larger ecological and social systems within which it resides. Only a more integrated view will enable companies to innovate for long-term profitability and sustainability. There are three core competencies that learning organizations must master to profit from sustainability: encourage systemic thinking to sense the emerging future; convene strategic conversations with investors, customers, suppliers, and even competitors to build the trust needed to change outmoded mental models about what business success is; and take the lead in reshaping economic, political, and societal forces that stymie change. According to Senge and Carstedt, no time in history has afforded greater possibilities for a collective change in direction.

Case Authors : Peter M. Senge, Goran Carstedt

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Change management, Innovation, Internet, Sustainability, Transparency

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015834)	-10015834	-	-
Year 1	3447085	-6568749	3447085	0.9434	3251967
Year 2	3960578	-2608171	7407663	0.89	3524900
Year 3	3968702	1360531	11376365	0.8396	3332199
Year 4	3238092	4598623	14614457	0.7921	2564872
TOTAL			14614457		12673938

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2658104

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Carstedt Postindustrial have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Carstedt Postindustrial shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Carstedt Postindustrial often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Carstedt Postindustrial needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015834)	-10015834	-	-
Year 1	3447085	-6568749	3447085	0.8696	2997465
Year 2	3960578	-2608171	7407663	0.7561	2994766
Year 3	3968702	1360531	11376365	0.6575	2609486
Year 4	3238092	4598623	14614457	0.5718	1851390
TOTAL					10453107

The Net NPV after 4 years is 437273

(10453107 - 10015834 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015834)	-10015834	-	-
Year 1	3447085	-6568749	3447085	0.8333	2872571
Year 2	3960578	-2608171	7407663	0.6944	2750401
Year 3	3968702	1360531	11376365	0.5787	2296703
Year 4	3238092	4598623	14614457	0.4823	1561580
TOTAL					9481255

The Net NPV after 4 years is -534579

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481255 - 10015834 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Carstedt Postindustrial to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Carstedt Postindustrial has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Carstedt Postindustrial can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Carstedt Postindustrial, then the stock price of the Carstedt Postindustrial should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Carstedt Postindustrial should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution

References & Further Readings

Peter M. Senge, Goran Carstedt (2018), "Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial Revolution Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.