Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Duncan Angwin, Sotirios Paroutis, Sarah Mitson. The Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? (referred as “Strategy Senior” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Informal leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? Case Study

With companies being exhorted to become more strategically agile and internally connected, this article examines the role of the Senior Strategy Director, the executive tasked specifically with internal strategy. In particular, it explores what they do, what specific capabilities they deploy to enable effective contribution to the company, and in what ways they facilitate the connectedness of strategy. An analysis of multiple interviews over time with Senior Strategy Directors of large companies shows the vital and challenging role these executives play in both shaping, connecting up, and executing strategy. This article identifies the particular capabilities necessary for Senior Strategy Directors to perform their role and shows how it all depends upon their skillful deployment. These findings have significant implications for understanding unfolding micro-processes of strategy in large organizations, for assumptions about the skills and capabilities necessary to be an effective Senior Strategy Director, and for business schools in terms of the content and style of strategy courses they provide.

Case Authors : Duncan Angwin, Sotirios Paroutis, Sarah Mitson

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Informal leadership

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10028365)	-10028365	-	-
Year 1	3446761	-6581604	3446761	0.9434	3251661
Year 2	3957271	-2624333	7404032	0.89	3521957
Year 3	3965158	1340825	11369190	0.8396	3329223
Year 4	3231100	4571925	14600290	0.7921	2559334
TOTAL			14600290		12662175

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2633810

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Strategy Senior shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Strategy Senior have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Strategy Senior often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Strategy Senior needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10028365)	-10028365	-	-
Year 1	3446761	-6581604	3446761	0.8696	2997183
Year 2	3957271	-2624333	7404032	0.7561	2992265
Year 3	3965158	1340825	11369190	0.6575	2607156
Year 4	3231100	4571925	14600290	0.5718	1847392
TOTAL					10443997

The Net NPV after 4 years is 415632

(10443997 - 10028365 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10028365)	-10028365	-	-
Year 1	3446761	-6581604	3446761	0.8333	2872301
Year 2	3957271	-2624333	7404032	0.6944	2748105
Year 3	3965158	1340825	11369190	0.5787	2294652
Year 4	3231100	4571925	14600290	0.4823	1558208
TOTAL					9473265

The Net NPV after 4 years is -555100

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473265 - 10028365 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Strategy Senior to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Strategy Senior has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Strategy Senior can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Strategy Senior, then the stock price of the Strategy Senior should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Strategy Senior should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link?

References & Further Readings

Duncan Angwin, Sotirios Paroutis, Sarah Mitson (2018), "Connecting Up Strategy: Are Sensor Strategy Directors a Missing Link? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.