×




The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Martin Flash, Story Jonathan, James Burnham. The The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy (referred as “Steel Takeover” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial markets, Government.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy Case Study


There are two cases. Both concern the six-month battle in 2006 to create the steel group, Arcelor Mittal, by far the largest steel company in the world, combining as it did the two largest companies. The takeover was of interest because it was the focus of three bitter debates: shareholder interests versus stakeholder interests, European champions versus global champions and the merits of either, and financial strategy versus industrial strategy The first case concentrates essentially on the political, financial and environmental issues (all in the wide sense) of the takeover. The second case looks more deeply at the specifically steel (and hence industrial) issues.


Case Authors : Martin Flash, Story Jonathan, James Burnham

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial markets, Government




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022096) -10022096 - -
Year 1 3465165 -6556931 3465165 0.9434 3269024
Year 2 3981534 -2575397 7446699 0.89 3543551
Year 3 3972320 1396923 11419019 0.8396 3335236
Year 4 3233753 4630676 14652772 0.7921 2561435
TOTAL 14652772 12709246




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687150

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Steel Takeover shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Steel Takeover have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Steel Takeover often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Steel Takeover needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022096) -10022096 - -
Year 1 3465165 -6556931 3465165 0.8696 3013187
Year 2 3981534 -2575397 7446699 0.7561 3010612
Year 3 3972320 1396923 11419019 0.6575 2611865
Year 4 3233753 4630676 14652772 0.5718 1848909
TOTAL 10484572


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462476

(10484572 - 10022096 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022096) -10022096 - -
Year 1 3465165 -6556931 3465165 0.8333 2887638
Year 2 3981534 -2575397 7446699 0.6944 2764954
Year 3 3972320 1396923 11419019 0.5787 2298796
Year 4 3233753 4630676 14652772 0.4823 1559487
TOTAL 9510875


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511221

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9510875 - 10022096 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Steel Takeover to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Steel Takeover has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Steel Takeover can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Steel Takeover, then the stock price of the Steel Takeover should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Steel Takeover should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy

References & Further Readings

Martin Flash, Story Jonathan, James Burnham (2018), "The Takeover of Arcelor by Mittal Steel: Change in a Mature Global Industry (B) - Industrial Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tsingtao Brewery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Cyberdyne SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


ProPhase Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Guizhou Jiulian A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Imv Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mustang Alliances SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Ageas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Miscellaneous)