×




Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas Kern, Leslie P. Willcocks, Eric Van Heck. The Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma (referred as “Winner's Curse” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Negotiations, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma Case Study


Large international corporations commonly engage in IT outsourcing. However, the process of evaluating, selecting, and subsequently contracting out or selling the organization's IT assets, people, and/or activities to a third-party supplier creates the possibility of a "Winner's Curse." This occurs when the supplier overpromises on what can be delivered for the contract price. This article presents a longitudinal outsourcing case study that explicates the often abstruse Winner's Curse, its effect on post-contract management and the relationship, and how it was alleviated by a mutual renegotiation of the terms of the deal. Building on auction and IT outsourcing theory, the article provides both a model of IT outsourcing processes and a Winner's Curse typology for understanding IT outsourcing ventures. To avoid the experience of relational trauma as a consequence of a Winner's Curse, this article identifies six lessons that client and supplier companies should consider before signing IT outsourcing deals.


Case Authors : Thomas Kern, Leslie P. Willcocks, Eric Van Heck

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Negotiations, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006468) -10006468 - -
Year 1 3452060 -6554408 3452060 0.9434 3256660
Year 2 3953516 -2600892 7405576 0.89 3518615
Year 3 3951630 1350738 11357206 0.8396 3317865
Year 4 3227136 4577874 14584342 0.7921 2556194
TOTAL 14584342 12649334




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642866

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Winner's Curse have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Winner's Curse shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Winner's Curse often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Winner's Curse needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006468) -10006468 - -
Year 1 3452060 -6554408 3452060 0.8696 3001791
Year 2 3953516 -2600892 7405576 0.7561 2989426
Year 3 3951630 1350738 11357206 0.6575 2598261
Year 4 3227136 4577874 14584342 0.5718 1845125
TOTAL 10434604


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428136

(10434604 - 10006468 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006468) -10006468 - -
Year 1 3452060 -6554408 3452060 0.8333 2876717
Year 2 3953516 -2600892 7405576 0.6944 2745497
Year 3 3951630 1350738 11357206 0.5787 2286823
Year 4 3227136 4577874 14584342 0.4823 1556296
TOTAL 9465333


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541135

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9465333 - 10006468 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Winner's Curse to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Winner's Curse has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Winner's Curse can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Winner's Curse, then the stock price of the Winner's Curse should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Winner's Curse should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma

References & Further Readings

Thomas Kern, Leslie P. Willcocks, Eric Van Heck (2018), "Winner's Curse in IT Outsourcing: Strategies for Avoiding Relational Trauma Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Changshouhua Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Tengda Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Qinhuangdao Port SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Plastic Omnium SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Firstlogic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


UOB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Manaksia Aluminium Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products