×




Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by George S. Day, Paul J.H. Schoemaker. The Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies (referred as “Dynamic Capabilities” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Government, Innovation, Market research, Networking, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies Case Study


The dynamic capabilities framework identifies three components as critical for successful organizational adaptation: sensing, seizing and transforming. By contrasting two distinct business cases, a long-term biofuel investment by DuPont and Novartis's rapid deployment of digital technologies in marketing, this article assesses the managerial implications of each of these components. It develops an embryonic contingency model that illustrates why the relative importance of dynamic capabilities varies across firms. The article also highlights the critical role played by strategic leaders, who must selectively adapt and refine dynamic capabilities and also serve as a last line of defense in times of rapid change.


Case Authors : George S. Day, Paul J.H. Schoemaker

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Government, Innovation, Market research, Networking, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005991) -10005991 - -
Year 1 3453917 -6552074 3453917 0.9434 3258412
Year 2 3977494 -2574580 7431411 0.89 3539956
Year 3 3939771 1365191 11371182 0.8396 3307908
Year 4 3239391 4604582 14610573 0.7921 2565901
TOTAL 14610573 12672177




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666186

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dynamic Capabilities shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dynamic Capabilities have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dynamic Capabilities often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dynamic Capabilities needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005991) -10005991 - -
Year 1 3453917 -6552074 3453917 0.8696 3003406
Year 2 3977494 -2574580 7431411 0.7561 3007557
Year 3 3939771 1365191 11371182 0.6575 2590463
Year 4 3239391 4604582 14610573 0.5718 1852132
TOTAL 10453559


The Net NPV after 4 years is 447568

(10453559 - 10005991 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005991) -10005991 - -
Year 1 3453917 -6552074 3453917 0.8333 2878264
Year 2 3977494 -2574580 7431411 0.6944 2762149
Year 3 3939771 1365191 11371182 0.5787 2279960
Year 4 3239391 4604582 14610573 0.4823 1562206
TOTAL 9482579


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523412

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482579 - 10005991 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dynamic Capabilities to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dynamic Capabilities has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dynamic Capabilities can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dynamic Capabilities, then the stock price of the Dynamic Capabilities should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dynamic Capabilities should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies

References & Further Readings

George S. Day, Paul J.H. Schoemaker (2018), "Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hubei Sanonda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Groupe Crit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


SNP Schneider SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Foundation Building SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Burelle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


SWK Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Zhidao Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Genuine Parts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Hisaka Works Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


VitzroSys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.