×




ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Philip Parker, Byron Ascott-Evans. The ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid (referred as “Chotukool Pyramid” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Social enterprise, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid Case Study


Supplement to case IN1236. With ChotuKool, an innovative cooler, Gopalan Sunderraman, Executive Vice President at Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing and his team were able to profitably address a need of bottom-of-the-pyramid consumers in rural India. Case A presents the challenge and the approach used (in-market research) to identify the need and design a solution. To ensure ChotuKool's go-to-market strategy is a success, G&B must get the finance model and distribution model right. Case B explains how G&B partnered with micro-finance institutions and empowerment initiatives targeting local women to address the finance and distribution model challenges. It also describes the non-financial impact that ChotuKool had on local entrepreneurs and consumers, as well as hinting at future avenues for growth.


Case Authors : Philip Parker, Byron Ascott-Evans

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Marketing, Social enterprise, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010963) -10010963 - -
Year 1 3471371 -6539592 3471371 0.9434 3274878
Year 2 3973750 -2565842 7445121 0.89 3536623
Year 3 3971256 1405414 11416377 0.8396 3334343
Year 4 3237298 4642712 14653675 0.7921 2564243
TOTAL 14653675 12710088




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2699125

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Chotukool Pyramid shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Chotukool Pyramid have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Chotukool Pyramid often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Chotukool Pyramid needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010963) -10010963 - -
Year 1 3471371 -6539592 3471371 0.8696 3018583
Year 2 3973750 -2565842 7445121 0.7561 3004726
Year 3 3971256 1405414 11416377 0.6575 2611165
Year 4 3237298 4642712 14653675 0.5718 1850936
TOTAL 10485410


The Net NPV after 4 years is 474447

(10485410 - 10010963 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010963) -10010963 - -
Year 1 3471371 -6539592 3471371 0.8333 2892809
Year 2 3973750 -2565842 7445121 0.6944 2759549
Year 3 3971256 1405414 11416377 0.5787 2298181
Year 4 3237298 4642712 14653675 0.4823 1561197
TOTAL 9511735


The Net NPV after 4 years is -499228

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9511735 - 10010963 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Chotukool Pyramid to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Chotukool Pyramid has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Chotukool Pyramid can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Chotukool Pyramid, then the stock price of the Chotukool Pyramid should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Chotukool Pyramid should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid

References & Further Readings

Philip Parker, Byron Ascott-Evans (2018), "ChotuKool (B): Consumer-centric Disruption at the Bottom of the Pyramid Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Yunnan Bowin Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Qeeka Home SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Endocyte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


LB Foster SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Graphex Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


World Class Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Adjuvant Cosme Japan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Tabcorp Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Pidilite Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Silence Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Nuveen PA MVF SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services