×




Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yee-Ching Lilian Chan, Horng-Tzu Hao. The Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. (referred as “Nei Rim” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. Case Study


The case looks at the board structure of Research in Motion Limited (RIM) since the probe of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) and Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) into the company's stock option granting practices in late 2006. Institutional investors, more specifically Northwest & Ethical Investments LP (NEI), were concerned about RIM's leadership and board structure in 2011 not because of non-compliance with regulations or accounting errors, but because of the drastic fall of the company's share price (see TN-Exhibit 1). Indeed, 2011 was a challenging year for RIM (see TN-Exhibit 2 for a list of events affecting RIM in 2011) as its launch of its tablet PlayBook was not as successful as compared to Apple's iPad 2. There was also increasing competition from Apple's iPhone 4S and other smartphones using the Android platform. In addition, a number of executives left the company in summer and early fall. There was also a service disruption, due to a failure of core switch in RIM's infrastructure, which interrupted email messages and internet services for millions of BlackBerry users over five continents in October 2011. Apart from these serious strategic and operational issues, institutional investors, more specifically NEI, questioned the dominance of executives on RIM's Board and asked for a split of the Chair and Co-CEO roles. In order to avert a showdown with shareholders at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) on July 12, 2011, RIM made an agreement with NEI to establish "a committee of independent directors to study its board structure, the merits of a lead director versus a chair, and the 'business necessity' for the company's co-CEOs to hold 'significant' board-level titles". This sets the theme of the case, i.e., assess RIM's board structure in 2011 and recommend resolutions to be included in the report due on January 31, 2012 to address the governance issues raised by NEI.


Case Authors : Yee-Ching Lilian Chan, Horng-Tzu Hao

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005333) -10005333 - -
Year 1 3448837 -6556496 3448837 0.9434 3253620
Year 2 3974673 -2581823 7423510 0.89 3537445
Year 3 3957261 1375438 11380771 0.8396 3322593
Year 4 3242367 4617805 14623138 0.7921 2568258
TOTAL 14623138 12681916




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676583

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nei Rim shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nei Rim have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nei Rim often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nei Rim needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005333) -10005333 - -
Year 1 3448837 -6556496 3448837 0.8696 2998989
Year 2 3974673 -2581823 7423510 0.7561 3005424
Year 3 3957261 1375438 11380771 0.6575 2601963
Year 4 3242367 4617805 14623138 0.5718 1853834
TOTAL 10460210


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454877

(10460210 - 10005333 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005333) -10005333 - -
Year 1 3448837 -6556496 3448837 0.8333 2874031
Year 2 3974673 -2581823 7423510 0.6944 2760190
Year 3 3957261 1375438 11380771 0.5787 2290082
Year 4 3242367 4617805 14623138 0.4823 1563641
TOTAL 9487944


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517389

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487944 - 10005333 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nei Rim to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nei Rim has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nei Rim can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nei Rim, then the stock price of the Nei Rim should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nei Rim should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd.

References & Further Readings

Yee-Ching Lilian Chan, Horng-Tzu Hao (2018), "Governance Reform at Research in Motion (RIM) Ltd. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


KBC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , S&Ls/Savings Banks


Polatechno SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Photography


Eckoh SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Shriram-City Union SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Carbonite SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Linc Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Alstom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Conglomerates , Conglomerates


GOCL Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Brack Capit N V SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Biogen Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs