×




Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Dennis Yao, Libby Cantrill, Patricia Wu. The Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment (referred as “Southwest Love” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment Case Study


The fall of 2004 brought exciting news to Love Field, the Texas headquarters of Southwest Airlines. Delta Airlines, one of Southwest's main competitors, had announced that it would dramatically decrease service from the nearby Dallas/Fort Worth International (DFW) airport, cutting the number of daily flights from 250 to a mere 21. Gary Kelly, Southwest's newly minted CEO, thought about what appeared to be a golden opportunity. How could Southwest best capitalize on Delta's withdrawal? As Kelly saw it, Southwest had several options to pursue the new business opportunities. A first was to service the canceled Delta routes from Love Field. A second possibility was to encourage members of Congress to repeal the Wright Amendment, which limited Southwest's flight offerings from Love Field. An alternative to fighting for the repeal of the Wright Amendment was for Southwest to lease the 18 gates that Delta had left at DFW. Kelly carefully considered his options. Was now the time to call his lobbyist?


Case Authors : Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Dennis Yao, Libby Cantrill, Patricia Wu

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004625) -10004625 - -
Year 1 3458154 -6546471 3458154 0.9434 3262409
Year 2 3954693 -2591778 7412847 0.89 3519663
Year 3 3952033 1360255 11364880 0.8396 3318203
Year 4 3228182 4588437 14593062 0.7921 2557023
TOTAL 14593062 12657298




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652673

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Southwest Love shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Southwest Love have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Southwest Love often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Southwest Love needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004625) -10004625 - -
Year 1 3458154 -6546471 3458154 0.8696 3007090
Year 2 3954693 -2591778 7412847 0.7561 2990316
Year 3 3952033 1360255 11364880 0.6575 2598526
Year 4 3228182 4588437 14593062 0.5718 1845724
TOTAL 10441656


The Net NPV after 4 years is 437031

(10441656 - 10004625 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004625) -10004625 - -
Year 1 3458154 -6546471 3458154 0.8333 2881795
Year 2 3954693 -2591778 7412847 0.6944 2746315
Year 3 3952033 1360255 11364880 0.5787 2287056
Year 4 3228182 4588437 14593062 0.4823 1556801
TOTAL 9471966


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532659

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471966 - 10004625 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Southwest Love to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Southwest Love has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Southwest Love can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Southwest Love, then the stock price of the Southwest Love should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Southwest Love should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment

References & Further Readings

Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Dennis Yao, Libby Cantrill, Patricia Wu (2018), "Lobbying for Love? Southwest Airlines and the Wright Amendment Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kma Global Solutions SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Timah Persero SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Genoway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Ramayana Lestari SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


MKH SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Palred Technologies Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Gamco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


SINTESI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services