×




Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas Hellmann, Marla Blow, Blair Boardman. The Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone (referred as “Jorgensen Zone” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Emerging markets, Generational issues, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone Case Study


When the first Discovery Zone, opened January 2, 1990, was immediately popular, Chairman Jim Jorgensen and his small team decided to open multiple stores quickly in the belief that whoever was first would own the business. They decided to use franchising as the method of expansion because it would allow the company to expand rapidly, fund its growth, and secure dedicated management. However, the company was unprepared for franchising, as there was no clear market size to support each store. Jorgensen recognized that there were other questions to be answered as well: Should all the stores be the same size? Should Discovery Zone also have some company-owned stores? How would franchising change the nature of competition in this newly emerging market? At the time of the case, just three weeks after the company had been operational, the principals are thinking about these questions and what they should do next.


Case Authors : Thomas Hellmann, Marla Blow, Blair Boardman

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Emerging markets, Generational issues, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021406) -10021406 - -
Year 1 3469382 -6552024 3469382 0.9434 3273002
Year 2 3967428 -2584596 7436810 0.89 3530997
Year 3 3964102 1379506 11400912 0.8396 3328336
Year 4 3235484 4614990 14636396 0.7921 2562806
TOTAL 14636396 12695142




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673736

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jorgensen Zone have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jorgensen Zone shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jorgensen Zone often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jorgensen Zone needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021406) -10021406 - -
Year 1 3469382 -6552024 3469382 0.8696 3016854
Year 2 3967428 -2584596 7436810 0.7561 2999946
Year 3 3964102 1379506 11400912 0.6575 2606461
Year 4 3235484 4614990 14636396 0.5718 1849898
TOTAL 10473159


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451753

(10473159 - 10021406 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021406) -10021406 - -
Year 1 3469382 -6552024 3469382 0.8333 2891152
Year 2 3967428 -2584596 7436810 0.6944 2755158
Year 3 3964102 1379506 11400912 0.5787 2294041
Year 4 3235484 4614990 14636396 0.4823 1560322
TOTAL 9500673


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520733

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500673 - 10021406 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jorgensen Zone to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jorgensen Zone has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jorgensen Zone can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jorgensen Zone, then the stock price of the Jorgensen Zone should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jorgensen Zone should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone

References & Further Readings

Thomas Hellmann, Marla Blow, Blair Boardman (2018), "Jim Jorgensen: The Initial Days at Discovery Zone Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Geberit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Bouygues SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cybele SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


TKC Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Dorel Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Hana Financial Eighth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Photonstar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Mynaric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment