Andres Galindo Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Andres Galindo case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Andres Galindo case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by William D. Bygrave, Carl Hedberg. The Andres Galindo (referred as “Andres Electra” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Globalization, Government, Growth strategy, Pricing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Andres Galindo Case Study

Andres Galindo is a young Colombian from an upper-middle class family in Bogota. With his brother Carlos serving as the sole importer in the country for the top American brand Electra Sportswear, Andres sets out to create a chain of retail stores located in high-end shopping districts. Understanding that his legally imported goods were at a dramatic cost disadvantage to openly marketed illegally imported brands and counterfeit labels (due to a 40% to 120% tariff), Andres decided to approach the problem as a retailing and marketing challenge by adding value through the retail sales process. By 2005, Andres has 14 stores and a new challenge: Electra has decided to cut out the middle man--Carlos--and have Andres import the product directly. This ought to lower margins, but it's a big step. Most important, though, is crafting a growth strategy for his company in the face of unfair competition and a relatively small target population.

Case Authors : William D. Bygrave, Carl Hedberg

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Globalization, Government, Growth strategy, Pricing

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Andres Galindo Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025859)	-10025859	-	-
Year 1	3468896	-6556963	3468896	0.9434	3272543
Year 2	3973640	-2583323	7442536	0.89	3536525
Year 3	3954647	1371324	11397183	0.8396	3320398
Year 4	3239706	4611030	14636889	0.7921	2566151
TOTAL			14636889		12695617

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669758

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Andres Electra shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Andres Electra have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Andres Galindo

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Andres Electra often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Andres Electra needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025859)	-10025859	-	-
Year 1	3468896	-6556963	3468896	0.8696	3016431
Year 2	3973640	-2583323	7442536	0.7561	3004643
Year 3	3954647	1371324	11397183	0.6575	2600245
Year 4	3239706	4611030	14636889	0.5718	1852312
TOTAL					10473631

The Net NPV after 4 years is 447772

(10473631 - 10025859 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025859)	-10025859	-	-
Year 1	3468896	-6556963	3468896	0.8333	2890747
Year 2	3973640	-2583323	7442536	0.6944	2759472
Year 3	3954647	1371324	11397183	0.5787	2288569
Year 4	3239706	4611030	14636889	0.4823	1562358
TOTAL					9501146

The Net NPV after 4 years is -524713

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501146 - 10025859 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Andres Electra to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Andres Electra has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Andres Electra can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Andres Electra, then the stock price of the Andres Electra should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Andres Electra should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Andres Galindo

References & Further Readings

William D. Bygrave, Carl Hedberg (2018), "Andres Galindo Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.