×




Electronic Arts in 1999 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Electronic Arts in 1999 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Electronic Arts in 1999 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza. The Electronic Arts in 1999 (referred as “Arts Electronic” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Electronic Arts in 1999 Case Study


Electronic Arts is a leader in the creation and distribution of game content for consoles and PCs. The company operates in an extremely challenging environment and must navigate console platform transitions and the like, while continuing to produce compelling content. In addition, the advent of the Internet has opened another potential distribution channel for the company's games. Explores the strategic decisions of the company in 1999 as it faces another platform transition, while deciding how it will respond to the opportunities and risks presented by online gaming.


Case Authors : Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Electronic Arts in 1999 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022026) -10022026 - -
Year 1 3450970 -6571056 3450970 0.9434 3255632
Year 2 3970176 -2600880 7421146 0.89 3533443
Year 3 3945036 1344156 11366182 0.8396 3312328
Year 4 3239429 4583585 14605611 0.7921 2565931
TOTAL 14605611 12667334




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2645308

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Arts Electronic have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Arts Electronic shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Electronic Arts in 1999

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Arts Electronic often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Arts Electronic needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022026) -10022026 - -
Year 1 3450970 -6571056 3450970 0.8696 3000843
Year 2 3970176 -2600880 7421146 0.7561 3002023
Year 3 3945036 1344156 11366182 0.6575 2593925
Year 4 3239429 4583585 14605611 0.5718 1852154
TOTAL 10448946


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426920

(10448946 - 10022026 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022026) -10022026 - -
Year 1 3450970 -6571056 3450970 0.8333 2875808
Year 2 3970176 -2600880 7421146 0.6944 2757067
Year 3 3945036 1344156 11366182 0.5787 2283007
Year 4 3239429 4583585 14605611 0.4823 1562225
TOTAL 9478107


The Net NPV after 4 years is -543919

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478107 - 10022026 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Arts Electronic to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Arts Electronic has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Arts Electronic can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Arts Electronic, then the stock price of the Arts Electronic should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Arts Electronic should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Electronic Arts in 1999

References & Further Readings

Robert A. Burgelman, Philip Meza (2018), "Electronic Arts in 1999 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aiphone Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


PSK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Goldman Sachs MLP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Hisense Kelon A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Mahaka Radio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


SAF Holland SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Komipharm Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Genomicvision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


MER SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Shenzhen Expressway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Vertex SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials