×




edX: Strategies for Higher Education Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for edX: Strategies for Higher Education case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. edX: Strategies for Higher Education case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David J. Collis, Matthew Shaffer, Ashley Hartman. The edX: Strategies for Higher Education (referred as “Edx Moocs” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Disruptive innovation, IT, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of edX: Strategies for Higher Education Case Study


In May 2012, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) founded edX, a new non-profit joint venture that would provide a platform for massive open online courses (MOOCs). edX did not produce original courses or instructional content-it made a web platform through which Harvard and MIT, and subsequently dozens more "partner" universities, could offer their lecture courses as MOOCs. While the future role of MOOCs in higher education remained a topic of public debate, edX needed to answer concrete managerial and strategic questions. For example, what should edX's scope be? Should edX try to develop a consumer brand of its own, or rely on the brands of its partners? And how could edX monetize its services to recoup Harvard and MIT's investments and reward participating universities? This case presented the history of edX and the online education market as background for a discussion about edX's strategic choices.


Case Authors : David J. Collis, Matthew Shaffer, Ashley Hartman

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Disruptive innovation, IT, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for edX: Strategies for Higher Education Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020735) -10020735 - -
Year 1 3455785 -6564950 3455785 0.9434 3260175
Year 2 3971414 -2593536 7427199 0.89 3534544
Year 3 3943064 1349528 11370263 0.8396 3310673
Year 4 3240338 4589866 14610601 0.7921 2566651
TOTAL 14610601 12672043




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651308

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Edx Moocs have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Edx Moocs shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of edX: Strategies for Higher Education

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Edx Moocs often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Edx Moocs needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020735) -10020735 - -
Year 1 3455785 -6564950 3455785 0.8696 3005030
Year 2 3971414 -2593536 7427199 0.7561 3002960
Year 3 3943064 1349528 11370263 0.6575 2592629
Year 4 3240338 4589866 14610601 0.5718 1852674
TOTAL 10453292


The Net NPV after 4 years is 432557

(10453292 - 10020735 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020735) -10020735 - -
Year 1 3455785 -6564950 3455785 0.8333 2879821
Year 2 3971414 -2593536 7427199 0.6944 2757926
Year 3 3943064 1349528 11370263 0.5787 2281866
Year 4 3240338 4589866 14610601 0.4823 1562663
TOTAL 9482276


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538459

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482276 - 10020735 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Edx Moocs to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Edx Moocs has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Edx Moocs can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Edx Moocs, then the stock price of the Edx Moocs should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Edx Moocs should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of edX: Strategies for Higher Education

References & Further Readings

David J. Collis, Matthew Shaffer, Ashley Hartman (2018), "edX: Strategies for Higher Education Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


CLS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Colfax SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Starlite SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


LaSalle Logiport SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Keurig Dr Pepper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Nonalcoholic)


Alcobra SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Wesizwe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Griffin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver