×




Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph N. Fry. The Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust (referred as “Laurentian B2b” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust Case Study


Executives of the Laurentian Bank of Canada were reviewing their plans for the launch of B2B Trust--a new business that would become Canada's first Internet-enabled wholesaler of financial services and products. If they proceed, they would be making a major internal and external commitment to a new way of doing business. They wanted to be sure they had it right and that the introduction would go smoothly. During this review, they needed to facilitate a strategic analysis of the B2B Trust initiative--assess the validity of the concepts, the appropriateness of it for the Laurentian Bank, and prepare recommendations for senior management.


Case Authors : Joseph N. Fry

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020462) -10020462 - -
Year 1 3457879 -6562583 3457879 0.9434 3262150
Year 2 3979149 -2583434 7437028 0.89 3541428
Year 3 3949767 1366333 11386795 0.8396 3316301
Year 4 3251510 4617843 14638305 0.7921 2575500
TOTAL 14638305 12695379




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674917

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Laurentian B2b shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Laurentian B2b have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Laurentian B2b often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Laurentian B2b needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020462) -10020462 - -
Year 1 3457879 -6562583 3457879 0.8696 3006851
Year 2 3979149 -2583434 7437028 0.7561 3008808
Year 3 3949767 1366333 11386795 0.6575 2597036
Year 4 3251510 4617843 14638305 0.5718 1859061
TOTAL 10471757


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451295

(10471757 - 10020462 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020462) -10020462 - -
Year 1 3457879 -6562583 3457879 0.8333 2881566
Year 2 3979149 -2583434 7437028 0.6944 2763298
Year 3 3949767 1366333 11386795 0.5787 2285745
Year 4 3251510 4617843 14638305 0.4823 1568051
TOTAL 9498659


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521803

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498659 - 10020462 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Laurentian B2b to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Laurentian B2b has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Laurentian B2b can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Laurentian B2b, then the stock price of the Laurentian B2b should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Laurentian B2b should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust

References & Further Readings

Joseph N. Fry (2018), "Laurentian Bank: B2B Trust Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


JMS Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


McClatchy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Kpx Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


OraSure SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Moly Mines SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


HKEX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services