×




Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by James C. Robinson. The Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care (referred as “Backlash Deregulation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care Case Study


The American health care system is undergoing a market and organizational transformation analogous to the deregulation of the transportation, communication, utility, and finance industries, with price competition replacing rate controls, new entrants displacing organizational incumbents, innovation disrupting stability, and individual choice supplanting governmental oversight. These turbulent changes are generating uncertainty, hostility, and a backlash towards re-regulation. This article compares the evolution of the health care sector with the experiences of other deregulated industries, highlighting four effects that cut across all sectors. Deregulation and the role of price competition has led everywhere to: lower costs, due to better capacity utilization and improved productivity; increased differentiation of prices and products, moving away from the one-size-fits-all patterns characteristic of regulated industries; dynamic changes in both market and organizational structures, culminating in consolidation into multi-product, geographically diversified firms; and political backlash, fueled by uncertainty, organized producer groups, and selected groups of consumers who do not benefit from the overall cost and product improvements.


Case Authors : James C. Robinson

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Regulation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028364) -10028364 - -
Year 1 3457517 -6570847 3457517 0.9434 3261808
Year 2 3966345 -2604502 7423862 0.89 3530033
Year 3 3936034 1331532 11359896 0.8396 3304770
Year 4 3228972 4560504 14588868 0.7921 2557648
TOTAL 14588868 12654260




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2625896

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Backlash Deregulation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Backlash Deregulation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Backlash Deregulation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Backlash Deregulation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028364) -10028364 - -
Year 1 3457517 -6570847 3457517 0.8696 3006537
Year 2 3966345 -2604502 7423862 0.7561 2999127
Year 3 3936034 1331532 11359896 0.6575 2588006
Year 4 3228972 4560504 14588868 0.5718 1846175
TOTAL 10439845


The Net NPV after 4 years is 411481

(10439845 - 10028364 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028364) -10028364 - -
Year 1 3457517 -6570847 3457517 0.8333 2881264
Year 2 3966345 -2604502 7423862 0.6944 2754406
Year 3 3936034 1331532 11359896 0.5787 2277797
Year 4 3228972 4560504 14588868 0.4823 1557182
TOTAL 9470650


The Net NPV after 4 years is -557714

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470650 - 10028364 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Backlash Deregulation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Backlash Deregulation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Backlash Deregulation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Backlash Deregulation, then the stock price of the Backlash Deregulation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Backlash Deregulation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care

References & Further Readings

James C. Robinson (2018), "Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


GHCL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Hybrigenics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


United Internet AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Hapag Lloyd AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Hefei Taihe Optoelectronic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Brampton Brick SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Regenicin, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


GFI Informatique SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Jiangsu Luokai Mechanical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Merck SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Major Drugs